NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 7 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 7

You have added two new AFF A250 nodes to an existing 4-node cluster with NetApp CN1610 cluster network switches. Although the nodes can join the cluster, the storage failover show command output shows that the NVRAM log is not synchronized, and it cannot reach the partner over an HA interconnect.

In this scenario, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

AThe AFF A250 requires switches with 40GbE port support.

BThe AFF A250 uses different ports for the cluster and the HA interconnect.

CThe AFF A250 requires switches with 25GbE port support.

DThe AFF A250 uses the same port for the cluster and the HA interconnect.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Wilda at Mar 15, 2024, 10:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashandra

3 months ago

Nope, it uses the same port for both, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

3 months ago

I thought the AFF A250 had separate ports for cluster and HA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure about the HA interconnect ports?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ailene

4 months ago

Totally agree, it's all about that 25GbE support!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

4 months ago

The AFF A250 needs 25GbE switches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

4 months ago

I’m confused about the HA interconnect setup; I thought they used the same ports, but now I’m second-guessing myself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we discussed port requirements, and I feel like 25GbE is the right answer for the AFF A250.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

I think the AFF A250 has separate ports for the cluster and HA interconnect, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

5 months ago

I remember something about the AFF A250 needing specific switch support, but I can't recall if it was 25GbE or 40GbE.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. Based on the information provided, the issue seems to be related to the cluster and HA interconnect configuration, not the port speeds. The AFF A250 uses the same ports for both the cluster and HA interconnect, so the problem is likely with the cabling or switch configuration, not the port support. I'll select options B and D as the correct answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The information provided doesn't seem to clearly indicate which statements are true. I'll need to review the AFF A250 specifications and cluster configuration requirements more closely to determine the correct answers. Maybe I'll start by looking up the port requirements for the AFF A250 and see if that helps me narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mendy

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The AFF A250 uses 25GbE ports for the cluster, and it has separate ports for the HA interconnect. The issue here is likely that the CN1610 switches don't support the required 25GbE ports, so the cluster and HA interconnect are not functioning properly. I'm confident that options C and D are the correct answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. The fact that the nodes can join the cluster but the NVRAM log is not synchronized and the HA interconnect is not working makes me think there might be a compatibility issue with the switches or cabling. I'll need to carefully consider the options and make sure I understand the requirements for the AFF A250 before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure about the specific port requirements for the AFF A250, but I think the key here is to focus on the issue with the NVRAM log and HA interconnect. I'll need to review the documentation on the AFF A250 and cluster configuration to determine the correct statements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamekia

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I think the Wavelength Tracker tool is likely related to tracking the protection path for a specific wavelength, so I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

5 months ago

I'll eliminate options that seem too generic. Probably want to select the most precise risk description.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The concepts of measures, dimensions, and hierarchies in DMR can be tricky. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely to make sure I understand the valid statements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

5 months ago

The distinction between loss reduction and loss transfer in risk management sounds right, but I'm not completely confident in which is emphasized more in health plans.

upvoted 0 times

...