Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-004 Exam - Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

A storage administrator wants to expand an existing NetApp ONTAP AFF cluster with cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes.What should the administrator do to accomplish this task?
B) Add a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster.
A) Upgrade the AFF controllers to a higher system.
C) Expand the cluster with a new AFF system.
D) Add SSDs to the existing AFF cluster.

NetApp NS0-004 Exam - Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-004 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-004 Questions]

A storage administrator wants to expand an existing NetApp ONTAP AFF cluster with cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes.

What should the administrator do to accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

= Adding a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster is a way to expand the storage capacity with cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes. A FAS system can use HDDs as the performance tier and tier cold data to cloud object storage using FabricPool, which is a NetApp data tiering technology that reduces the amount of physical capacity taken up by data. This way, the administrator can leverage the storage efficiencies of ONTAP and the low-cost storage of the cloud to archive data that is not frequently accessed. The AFF and FAS systems can be managed by the same ONTAP cluster and provide seamless data access and protection.Reference=Storage Efficiencies - NetApp,Data Archiving: Cost-Effective Cloud Storage - NetApp,AFF Systems and Cloud Volumes ONTAP | NetApp.


by Gladys at Jan 25, 2024, 03:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-004 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mammie
9 months ago
Definitely need a new AFF for archiving, makes total sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
9 months ago
Surprised that upgrading controllers isn't the best choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
10 months ago
Isn't it more cost-effective to just add a FAS system instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
I think adding SSDs is a better option for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
10 months ago
Expanding with a new AFF system is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
10 months ago
Adding SSDs might improve performance, but for archiving, I think we need something more suited for cost-effective storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
10 months ago
Upgrading the AFF controllers sounds tempting, but I feel like that wouldn't really help with archiving needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
10 months ago
I remember a practice question about adding a FAS system, but that seemed more focused on performance than archiving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
11 months ago
I think expanding the cluster with a new AFF system makes sense for nearline storage, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it. The key is that the administrator wants to add cost-effective nearline storage, so the best option is to add a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
11 months ago
Upgrading the AFF controllers doesn't seem like the right approach here. The question is asking about adding nearline storage, not improving the performance of the existing AFF cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between adding a new FAS system or expanding the cluster with a new AFF system. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I think the answer is to add a new FAS system to the existing AFF cluster, since that would provide the cost-effective nearline storage for archiving purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the "unique solution" part. Does that mean there could be multiple correct answers, or that each question has a single correct solution? I'll need to read through the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
11 months ago
I'm not quite sure about the details, but I think LocationListener is more about tracking location changes rather than changing a database, which makes option B seem off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
I think B looks right - interviewing takes real skill to read people's reactions accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel