A customer wants to use a NetApp pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service (STaaS) offering for their critical NFS and FCP data.Which option meets this requirement?
I'm a bit confused by the options. Can Astra Control, Keystone, and Cloud Volumes ONTAP also provide pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service for NFS and FCP data? I'll need to research those options more.
Azure NetApp Files sounds like the right choice here. It's a NetApp offering that provides storage-as-a-service, and it supports both NFS and FCP protocols.
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think Azure NetApp Files is the best option to meet the pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service requirement for NFS and FCP data.
Based on the information provided, Azure NetApp Files seems like the most straightforward solution to meet the customer's requirements. I'll double-check the details, but I'm leaning towards that as the best answer.
This looks like a straightforward network topology question. I'll carefully examine the diagram and options to determine how the load balancer functions in this setup.
upvoted 0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Maile
9 months agoClorinda
9 months agoElouise
9 months agoAnnamae
10 months agoLazaro
10 months agoStevie
10 months agoJanessa
10 months agoAleisha
10 months agoAlesia
11 months agoStephaine
11 months agoVerdell
11 months agoLoreta
11 months agoRex
11 months agoHan
11 months agoBlondell
11 months agoEarlean
11 months agoAllene
11 months agoJodi
11 months ago