A customer wants to use a NetApp pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service (STaaS) offering for their critical NFS and FCP data.Which option meets this requirement?
I'm a bit confused by the options. Can Astra Control, Keystone, and Cloud Volumes ONTAP also provide pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service for NFS and FCP data? I'll need to research those options more.
Azure NetApp Files sounds like the right choice here. It's a NetApp offering that provides storage-as-a-service, and it supports both NFS and FCP protocols.
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think Azure NetApp Files is the best option to meet the pay-as-you-grow storage-as-a-service requirement for NFS and FCP data.
Based on the information provided, Azure NetApp Files seems like the most straightforward solution to meet the customer's requirements. I'll double-check the details, but I'm leaning towards that as the best answer.
This looks like a straightforward network topology question. I'll carefully examine the diagram and options to determine how the load balancer functions in this setup.
upvoted 0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Maile
7 months agoClorinda
8 months agoElouise
8 months agoAnnamae
8 months agoLazaro
8 months agoStevie
9 months agoJanessa
9 months agoAleisha
9 months agoAlesia
9 months agoStephaine
9 months agoVerdell
9 months agoLoreta
9 months agoRex
9 months agoHan
9 months agoBlondell
9 months agoEarlean
9 months agoAllene
9 months agoJodi
10 months ago