Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-004 Exam - Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-004 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 2
[All NS0-004 Questions]

Which NetApp BlueXP product enables a customer to provide read and write access to remote Windows servers from a centralized datastore?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BlueXP copy and sync is a NetApp BlueXP feature that enables customers to send data between Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP and Amazon S3. BlueXP copy and sync allows customers to create data transfer relationships between different storage sources and destinations, including FSx for ONTAP and S3. BlueXP copy and sync supports both one-time and recurring data transfers, with options to schedule, monitor, and manage the data transfer operations. BlueXP copy and sync helps customers to migrate, backup, archive, or distribute their data across different storage environments.Reference=Copy and sync data,Copy and sync data between FSx for ONTAP and S3,Copy and sync data overview


by Rosendo at Dec 08, 2024, 07:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-004 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ligia
6 months ago
I agree, Cloud Volumes ONTAP seems right for remote access!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
6 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
6 months ago
BlueXP tiering is for optimizing storage, not access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
7 months ago
Definitely not edge caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
7 months ago
I think it's Cloud Volumes ONTAP!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards BlueXP copy and sync, but I need to double-check if it really provides that access feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
I feel like tiering could be relevant, but it usually deals more with storage optimization rather than direct access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about edge caching, but I don't think that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
8 months ago
I think the answer might be Cloud Volumes ONTAP, but I'm not entirely sure if it specifically mentions remote Windows servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
8 months ago
Cloud Volumes ONTAP is a different product, so I don't think that's the right answer. I'm going to go with BlueXP edge caching - that seems to fit the description best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
8 months ago
BlueXP tiering is for moving data between tiers of storage, so that's probably not the right answer. I'm leaning towards either BlueXP copy and sync or edge caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
8 months ago
I think the key here is remote access to Windows servers. That sounds like it could be BlueXP edge caching, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
8 months ago
Okay, I've used BlueXP copy and sync before, but I'm not sure if that's the right answer here. I'll need to double-check the product descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
8 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the different BlueXP products and their capabilities to figure out which one provides remote Windows server access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
Well, since this is a NetApp question, I bet the answer is something with 'Blue' in the name. 'BlueXP' sounds pretty legit to me!
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
11 months ago
D) Cloud Volumes ONTAP
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
12 months ago
C) BlueXP tiering
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
12 months ago
B) BlueXP edge caching
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
12 months ago
A) BlueXP copy and sync
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
1 year ago
Nah, guys, the answer has to be A) BlueXP copy and sync. I mean, it's in the name - it's all about syncing data across remote locations, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Glory
11 months ago
I agree with you, let's go with A) BlueXP copy and sync for providing read and write access to remote Windows servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A) BlueXP copy and sync is the most suitable for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
11 months ago
But what about B) BlueXP edge caching? Doesn't that also involve remote access to data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
12 months ago
I think you're right, A) BlueXP copy and sync does sound like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
Hold on, I'm pretty sure the answer is D) Cloud Volumes ONTAP. It's a cloud-based storage solution, so it should be able to provide remote access capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Isn't C) BlueXP tiering the one that deals with remote data access? It sounds like the right fit to me.
upvoted 0 times
Marcos
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think BlueXP tiering might be the one we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
1 year ago
I think you might be right. BlueXP tiering does sound like it could handle remote data access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walton
1 year ago
But BlueXP copy and sync allows for centralized datastore access, which fits the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) BlueXP edge caching. It allows remote access to Windows servers, right?
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
1 year ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I'll go with B) BlueXP edge caching then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
No, it's not A. The correct answer is B) BlueXP edge caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 year ago
I believe it's actually A) BlueXP copy and sync that provides that functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. BlueXP edge caching enables read and write access to remote Windows servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) BlueXP edge caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) BlueXP copy and sync.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel