MENU
A customer wants a disaster recovery solution in the cloud. The SnapMirror destination needs to be fully managed by the cloud provider.
Which service should the customer use?
38 comments · newest first
LE
Leonora
10 months ago
C seems like a solid choice, but I’m not sure it’s fully managed.
DO
Dorinda
11 months ago
I’m surprised this isn’t more straightforward.
SH
Sharee
11 months ago
Wait, isn't A a good option too?
XO
Xochitl
11 months ago
Definitely agree with B! It's the best fit.
AR
Armanda
11 months ago
I think it's B, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service.
BE
Bev
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, but I’m not confident if it meets the fully managed requirement.
VE
Veronika
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like C, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, could also be a contender, but it might not be fully managed.
TI
Tiara
12 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about Azure NetApp Files being a good option for disaster recovery.
YE
Yen
1 year ago
I think the answer might be B, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service, since it’s designed for managed services in the cloud.
BO
Bong
1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with the different NetApp cloud services, so I'll need to think this through carefully. The wording about the SnapMirror destination being fully managed is the important clue here.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
Based on the details provided, I believe the correct answer is option B, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service. This service is fully managed by the cloud provider and should meet the customer's requirements.
EL
Eladia
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about cloud-based disaster recovery solutions. I think the key is identifying the service that is fully managed by the cloud provider.
JO
Joanna
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. There are a few NetApp-related options here, and I'm not sure which one would be the best fit for a fully managed SnapMirror destination.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
The high number of rows being read in the "Read" section is a red flag. I'll need to investigate if there are any issues with the table structure or data distribution that could be causing the delay.
MA
Maryrose
1 year ago
Okay, they're selecting every 12th record systematically - that sounds like systematic sampling to me.
EL
Elvera
1 year ago
Race conditions seem like a clear vulnerability a miner could exploit. I feel like we discussed it in relation to transaction ordering.
HO
Horace
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to identify the issue causing the WLC to be "uncontactable" and then select the appropriate action to resolve it. I'll carefully consider each option.
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
I bet the customer is relieved they don't have to manage their own disks. That's like having to do your own laundry in the cloud.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is an interesting choice, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit here. It might be overkill for a simple disaster recovery solution.
EL
Elly
1 year ago
D: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP might be too complex for just a disaster recovery solution.
YU
Yuette
1 year ago
C: Azure NetApp Files could also work well for this, providing a reliable solution in the cloud.
RO
Robt
1 year ago
B: Yeah, it's a fully managed service that can handle disaster recovery efficiently.
KI
Kimberely
1 year ago
A: I think NetApp Cloud Volumes Service would be a good fit for this scenario.
RO
Rosita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could also be a viable option, but the question specifically mentions the need for a fully managed solution, so I'm not sure if that one would fit the requirements.
HE
Helaine
1 year ago
C: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP might be worth considering as well.
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
B: I think Azure NetApp Files could also be a good choice for a fully managed solution.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
A: The customer should use NetApp Cloud Volumes Service.
ME
Melynda
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards NetApp Cloud Volumes Service. It offers a similar level of management as Azure NetApp Files, and it might be a better fit depending on the customer's cloud preferences.
RU
Rusty
1 year ago
It's definitely worth considering, especially if the customer prefers NetApp's cloud services.
MA
Marion
1 year ago
I agree, it provides fully managed SnapMirror destination in the cloud.
MA
Marisha
1 year ago
I think NetApp Cloud Volumes Service would be a good choice for that scenario.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
Azure NetApp Files seems like the obvious choice here. The customer wants a fully managed disaster recovery solution, and Azure NetApp Files fits the bill perfectly.
CO
Cordell
1 year ago
C: It's definitely the right choice for the customer's requirements. Azure NetApp Files is the way to go.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
B: I agree, Azure NetApp Files is designed for high-performance workloads and provides the necessary features for disaster recovery.
MA
Mable
1 year ago
A: Azure NetApp Files would be the best option for a fully managed disaster recovery solution in the cloud.
TI
Tijuana
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Azure NetApp Files could also be a suitable option for the customer.
KY
Kyoko
2 years ago
I agree with Xochitl. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is a good choice for fully managed SnapMirror destination in the cloud.
XO
Xochitl
2 years ago
I think the customer should use NetApp Cloud Volumes Service.