New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NCMA CPCM Exam - Topic 4 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCMA's CPCM exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 4
[All CPCM Questions]

Who is less likely to change or cancel the contract and therefore represents a lower risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Allene
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, but I see the points for B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
3 months ago
C could be a solid choice too, assigned personnel have responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if the market changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
4 months ago
I think B is just as reliable, sellers want to close deals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
4 months ago
Definitely A, committed buyers stick around!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I wonder if "none of the above" could be a trick option. I feel like we had a practice question like that before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
4 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we discussed how assigned personnel can sometimes change, which makes them riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about committed sellers being more stable too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
5 months ago
I think a committed buyer is less likely to change the contract since they have already invested in the purchase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option to figure out which one is least likely to result in contract changes or cancellation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
I'm confident I can solve this. The committed seller is clearly the lowest risk since they have the most incentive to follow through on the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll evaluate the stability and commitment level of each option to determine which one represents the lowest risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about contract risk. I'll need to think about the motivations and incentives of the different parties involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully consider the potential for each party to change or cancel the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the answer choices. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the relationships between the network devices and how to best represent that in the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
10 months ago
Ah, the old 'committed' conundrum. I say we just throw darts at the options and see what sticks. It's probably the safest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
10 months ago
The committed buyer, huh? I don't know, they sound a bit too 'committed' if you ask me. Might be a ticking time bomb waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
9 months ago
But what if they change their mind last minute?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
9 months ago
I agree, they are less likely to cancel the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
9 months ago
Committed buyers are usually more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frederica
10 months ago
None of the above? Really? That's a cop-out answer if you ask me. I'm going with B - the committed seller.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
9 months ago
Assigned personnel can change, but a committed seller is more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
9 months ago
I agree, a committed seller is less likely to cancel last minute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
10 months ago
Committed seller is a good choice. They have more invested in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
10 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The assigned personnel could be a wildcard - they might be more inclined to change things up for their own reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
10 months ago
Hmm, the committed seller seems like the safer bet. They've got a vested interest in seeing the contract through to the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
10 months ago
I think the committed buyer is less likely to change or cancel the contract. They've already made a commitment, so they're more likely to follow through.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
9 months ago
Committed sellers can also be reliable, but I think a committed buyer is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
10 months ago
I agree, a committed buyer is definitely less likely to change or cancel the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorenza
10 months ago
But what about a Committed Seller? They also have a vested interest in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
11 months ago
I agree with Josephine, a Committed Buyer has more at stake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
11 months ago
I think a Committed Buyer is less likely to change the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel