Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NCMA CPCM Exam - Topic 4 Question 90 Discussion

Posted by Tabetha on Jun 19, 2024 at 02:19 AM

Who is less likely to change or cancel the contract and therefore represents a lower risk?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CPCM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
AL
Allene 10 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, but I see the points for B as well.
MY
Myong 11 months ago
C could be a solid choice too, assigned personnel have responsibilities.
TA
Tasia 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if the market changes?
DO
Domingo 11 months ago
I think B is just as reliable, sellers want to close deals.
KI
Kimberlie 11 months ago
Definitely A, committed buyers stick around!
JE
Jettie 12 months ago
I wonder if "none of the above" could be a trick option. I feel like we had a practice question like that before.
ZI
Zita 12 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we discussed how assigned personnel can sometimes change, which makes them riskier.
EM
Emmett 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about committed sellers being more stable too.
PR
Providencia 1 year ago
I think a committed buyer is less likely to change the contract since they have already invested in the purchase.
LI
Lina 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option to figure out which one is least likely to result in contract changes or cancellation.
AR
Arlette 1 year ago
I'm confident I can solve this. The committed seller is clearly the lowest risk since they have the most incentive to follow through on the contract.
GL
Gladys 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll evaluate the stability and commitment level of each option to determine which one represents the lowest risk.
MI
Mi 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about contract risk. I'll need to think about the motivations and incentives of the different parties involved.
TO
Tomoko 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully consider the potential for each party to change or cancel the contract.
SH
Sheridan 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the answer choices. I'll need to think this through carefully.
IS
Isabelle 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the relationships between the network devices and how to best represent that in the database.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
Ah, the old 'committed' conundrum. I say we just throw darts at the options and see what sticks. It's probably the safest approach.
EM
Emerson 1 year ago
The committed buyer, huh? I don't know, they sound a bit too 'committed' if you ask me. Might be a ticking time bomb waiting to happen.
IR
Irma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
But what if they change their mind last minute?
BE
Bettina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
I agree, they are less likely to cancel the contract.
FL
Florinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
Committed buyers are usually more reliable.
FR
Frederica 1 year ago
None of the above? Really? That's a cop-out answer if you ask me. I'm going with B - the committed seller.
RO
Rosendo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frederica
Assigned personnel can change, but a committed seller is more reliable.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frederica
I agree, a committed seller is less likely to cancel last minute.
AZ
Azzie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frederica
Committed seller is a good choice. They have more invested in the contract.
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The assigned personnel could be a wildcard - they might be more inclined to change things up for their own reasons.
JA
Janna 1 year ago
Hmm, the committed seller seems like the safer bet. They've got a vested interest in seeing the contract through to the end.
LI
Lizette 1 year ago
I think the committed buyer is less likely to change or cancel the contract. They've already made a commitment, so they're more likely to follow through.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lizette
Committed sellers can also be reliable, but I think a committed buyer is the safest bet.
AN
Anjelica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lizette
I agree, a committed buyer is definitely less likely to change or cancel the contract.
LO
Lorenza 1 year ago
But what about a Committed Seller? They also have a vested interest in the contract.
EL
Elliott 2 years ago
I agree with Josephine, a Committed Buyer has more at stake.
JO
Josephine 2 years ago
I think a Committed Buyer is less likely to change the contract.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel