New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NCMA CPCM Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCMA's CPCM exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All CPCM Questions]

A legal connection or relationship that exists between the contracting parties is known as:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by James at May 03, 2022, 03:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPCM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Isreal
4 months ago
Totally agree, privity is key in contracts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
4 months ago
Contract privity is the correct term here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
4 months ago
Wait, is civil contract even a thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
I thought it was bilateral contract?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
5 months ago
It's definitely contract privity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that "Contract plaintiff" isn't the right term for this. It has to do with the parties involved, but I can't remember the exact wording.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
I'm torn between "Contract privity" and "Bilateral Contract." I feel like both terms were used in similar contexts during our study sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the relationship between parties in a contract, and "privity" came up a lot. It seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
5 months ago
I think the answer might be "Contract privity," but I'm not completely sure. It sounds familiar from the lectures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got it. The first usable label is 10,001 since the segment starts at 10,000. And the last usable label is 10,499 since the index range is 500.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Evaluating the campaign immediately after creating it seems a bit premature to me. I'd want to give it some time to actually get out there and see how it's performing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about mobile marketing policies. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes the approach of explicitly requesting opt-in from the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know JIT is about reducing inventory, but I'm not sure if it's always immediately preceded by ship-to-stock. Could it also be related to having multiple suppliers or some kind of customer-supplier alliance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
5 months ago
I think we discussed that BFD doesn't really require disabling Cisco Express Forwarding, but I'm not 100% clear on the details.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel