MENU
Bishop and Schroeder make the point that lack of marketability discounts should be recognized, just as they are in Tax Court, because one spouse usually gets liquid assets while the other spouse lacks:
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CVA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
JE
Jenelle
12 months ago
I thought cashing out was always an option, why the discounts?
LA
Lazaro
12 months ago
B is definitely the right choice here, makes the most sense.
AL
Alease
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure this applies in all cases? Seems a bit inconsistent.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
Totally agree, it’s only fair to recognize that difference!
SA
Salley
1 year ago
Lack of marketability discounts are a real issue in divorce settlements.
KE
Kelvin
1 year ago
I think the key point is about the safety of cashing out assets, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s what Bishop and Schroeder emphasized.
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
I feel like the answer might be about the underlying principles being broadly accepted, but I could be mixing it up with another topic we covered.
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
This question reminds me of a practice case we did where one spouse got the house and the other got cash. I think it relates to the flexibility of cashing out, but I can't recall the exact wording.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I remember discussing how lack of marketability discounts can really impact asset division in divorce cases, but I'm not sure which option fits best here.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
The question is asking for the correct format, so I'll need to analyze each option closely to determine the right one.
LI
Lili
1 year ago
Based on the information provided, I think the answer is switch. The question states the network needs to support only wired connections, and switch is the Meraki network type for that scenario.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
I vaguely recall something about "data mining" in the context of security, but that seems less related to incident response, right?
DA
Darci
1 year ago
Option A seems straightforward - revenue and corresponding expenses in the same period. That sounds exactly like what the matching principle requires.
LO
Louann
1 year ago
Marketability discounts? More like 'how to make the most out of a bad situation' discounts. But yeah, D is the way to go.
HE
Henriette
1 year ago
Ha! Looks like someone's trying to trick us with those options. D is the only one that really makes sense in the context of the question.
MA
Maile
1 year ago
I was torn between B and D, but I think D captures the essence of the issue more accurately. The flexibility and safety of being able to cash out is a crucial factor.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
Both B and D make valid points, but I lean towards D for its emphasis on flexibility and safety.
AL
Alton
1 year ago
I think B is also important because it talks about the underlying principles that are broadly accepted.
FA
Fabiola
1 year ago
I agree, D really highlights the importance of being able to cash out easily.
KA
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
Option D seems to be the most logical answer here. The lack of flexibility and safety to readily cash out the assets is a key reason why marketability discounts should be recognized.
JA
Janessa
1 year ago
Option D seems to be the most logical answer here.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
D) The flexibility and safety of being able to ''cash out'' readily at the owner's option
BL
Blossom
1 year ago
A) the mode of payment as it is the exchange of interests in the marital assets
FA
Fatima
2 years ago
I believe option D makes sense, as having the flexibility to 'cash out' easily can be crucial in divorce settlements.
SK
Skye
2 years ago
I agree with you, Blossom. It's important to consider the financial implications for both spouses.
BL
Blossom
2 years ago
I think lack of marketability discounts should be recognized in divorce cases.