Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NACVA CVA Exam - Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for NACVA's CVA exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All CVA Questions]

Buy-sell agreement may specify that the shares be valued strictly at their fair market value as:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cristal at Jan 26, 2025, 02:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CVA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beckie
5 months ago
I thought controlling interests were always valued higher?
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
5 months ago
Definitely B, no discounts should apply!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
5 months ago
Wait, can you really discount for lack of control? Seems unfair.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
6 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
6 months ago
Fair market value is key in buy-sell agreements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards D because it seems like both B and C could apply in different scenarios we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
6 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen questions that mention discounts before, so maybe C could be correct too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
6 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because we practiced valuing shares without discounts for control or marketability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
7 months ago
I remember discussing fair market value in class, but I'm not sure if it always means controlling interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
7 months ago
B looks like the best answer to me. The question is specifically asking about how the shares should be valued, and B describes the valuation approach without any discounts, which seems most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key is understanding the difference between fair market value, controlling ownership interests, and discounts for lack of control or marketability. I'll work through each answer choice methodically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to make sure I understand the nuances between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is B based on the description of proportionate share of enterprise value with no discounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
11 months ago
The exam gods are really testing our understanding of business valuation here. Option B sounds like the 'fair' choice, but option C might be more realistic in the real world.
upvoted 0 times
Stanton
10 months ago
Yeah, option B sounds good in theory, but option C might be the way to go in real-world scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
10 months ago
I agree, option B is ideal but option C might be more common in actual buy-sell agreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
It's true, option B seems fair but option C could be more realistic in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
I think option B makes sense in theory, but option C might be more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
11 months ago
As an accountant, I'd say option C is the way to go. A specified percentage discount is a more practical approach than trying to determine a 'fair' value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
12 months ago
Haha, I guess the shareholders are trying to have their cake and eat it too with option D. Can't decide on fair market value or a discount? Why not both!
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
10 months ago
Glenn: Exactly, can't decide on fair market value or a discount, so why not have both?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's like having their cake and eating it too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
10 months ago
User 1: Yeah, option D seems like they want the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaac
12 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. The absence of discounts for lack of control or marketability makes sense, but a specified percentage discount could also be reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
Remedios
11 months ago
That's true. D does cover all possibilities. It might be the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
11 months ago
I see your point, but D could also work. It includes both options, so it covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
12 months ago
I think B makes more sense. No discounts for lack of control or marketability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice, as it specifies the shares should be valued at a proportionate share of the enterprise value without any discounts.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
11 months ago
I think it ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of the agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
11 months ago
True, having both options B and C covered could provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
But option D also includes option B, so it might be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
1 year ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marnie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that, I think it could also be C) At a specified percentage discount from a proportionate share of total enterprise value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
1 year ago
I agree with Roosevelt, because it makes sense to value the shares at a proportionate share of the enterprise value with no discounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Both B & C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel