New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

MongoDB C100DBA Exam - Topic 3 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for MongoDB's C100DBA exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 3
[All C100DBA Questions]

In order to ensure that you can maintain high availability in the face of server failure, you should implement which of the following?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Johana
2 months ago
Wait, can you really rely on replication alone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
2 months ago
Sharding doesn't really help with server failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
Replication is key for high availability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
3 months ago
Proper storage engine matters too, but replication is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
Totally agree, replication saves the day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the role of indexes in this context. They seem more about performance than availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
3 months ago
I feel like user roles and storage engines are important, but they don't directly relate to high availability like replication does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think replication was the answer. It helps with failover, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
I think replication is the key here, but I'm not entirely sure if sharding could also play a role in high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 months ago
The storage engine could be important, but I think replication is the key thing to focus on for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
4 months ago
Putting indexes on all documents? That doesn't sound like it would help with availability. I'll rule that one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
4 months ago
I'm not sure about sharding - that's more for scaling, right? I'll have to double-check the differences between that and replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
5 months ago
Replication seems like the obvious choice here. That's the best way to ensure your data is still available if a server goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
5 months ago
I would go with E) The proper storage engine, it's crucial for availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
6 months ago
Putting indexes on all documents? That's just gonna slow everything down. Replication is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Mona
5 months ago
Properly defined user roles are important too, but replication is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
5 months ago
I agree, sharding can be complex and indexing everything might slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
5 months ago
Replication is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rossana
6 months ago
I agree with Noemi, replication helps maintain high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
7 months ago
Properly defined user roles? That's more for security than availability. Gotta go with replication on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
7 months ago
Sharding is great for scaling, but it won't help with high availability. I'd go with replication for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
7 months ago
I think the answer is C) Replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
7 months ago
Replication is definitely the way to go to ensure high availability. Servers can fail, but with replication, the data is always available.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
6 months ago
I agree, replication is key for maintaining high availability in the face of server failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
6 months ago
Replication is definitely the way to go to ensure high availability. Servers can fail, but with replication, the data is always available.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel