Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

MongoDB C100DBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Yvonne on May 01, 2025 at 08:54 PM

You have a replicated cluster with 1 primary, 3 secondary, 1 arbiter. One of the secondary is hidden. What is the replication factor of this replicated cluster?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium C100DBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
MA
Magda 10 months ago
Wait, how is it 4? I thought it was 3.
TE
Terrilyn 10 months ago
Totally agree, it's 4!
ST
Stephaine 10 months ago
Don't forget the arbiter counts too!
CL
Claudio 10 months ago
Yep, 4 makes sense with 1 primary and 3 secondaries.
ME
Meaghan 11 months ago
The replication factor is 4.
KA
Kandis 11 months ago
If I remember correctly, the replication factor should be the number of primaries plus secondaries, but I’m confused about the arbiter's role here.
KA
Kallie 11 months ago
I feel like the hidden secondary might not count towards the replication factor, but I can't recall exactly how that works.
SH
Sheridan 11 months ago
I remember a practice question where we calculated the replication factor, and I think it was something like the total number of nodes minus the arbiter.
LI
Ligia 12 months ago
I think the replication factor is related to the number of nodes, but I'm not sure how the hidden secondary affects it.
BR
Brianne 12 months ago
Wait, I think the hidden secondary does count. So the total number of copies is 1 primary, 4 secondaries, and 1 arbiter, which makes the replication factor 6.
TA
Tamra 12 months ago
Okay, I got this. The replication factor is the total number of copies of the data, including the primary and all secondaries. So with 1 primary, 3 secondaries, and 1 arbiter, the replication factor is 5.
AN
Anissa 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the hidden secondary still count towards the replication factor? Let me think this through again.
KY
Kyoko 1 year ago
I think the replication factor is 6, since there's 1 primary, 3 secondaries, and 1 arbiter. The hidden secondary doesn't count, right?
SH
Shaquana 1 year ago
Wait, why is there an arbiter if there are only 3 secondaries? Must be a trick question. I'll go with D just to be safe.
RE
Reta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
Let's go with D then.
YO
Youlanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
Yeah, it must be a trick question with the arbiter included.
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
I agree, I'll go with D as well.
YU
Yuonne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
I think the replication factor is 6.
AP
Apolonia 1 year ago
Hmm, I was going to say C, but D makes more sense. Gotta love these tricky replication questions!
DE
Delisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
Yeah, it can be tricky to keep track of all the different configurations in a replicated cluster.
KA
Kallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I agree, D) 06 makes sense with 1 primary, 3 secondary, and 1 arbiter.
LE
Leana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I think the replication factor is D) 06.
CH
Chuck 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
Yeah, D) 06 makes sense with the hidden secondary included.
JU
Julian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Apolonia
I think the replication factor is D) 06.
KE
Kenneth 1 year ago
D definitely seems right. The hidden secondary doesn't count towards the replication factor, so it's 6 nodes in total.
BE
Beata 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenneth
So, the replication factor for this cluster is indeed 6. The hidden secondary doesn't contribute to the replication factor count.
MI
Mi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenneth
Yes, that's correct. The replication factor is calculated based on the number of visible nodes in the cluster.
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenneth
D definitely seems right. The hidden secondary doesn't count towards the replication factor, so it's 6 nodes in total.
JO
Joana 1 year ago
I agree with Solange, the hidden secondary and arbiter are not part of the replication factor, so it should be 4.
LI
Ligia 1 year ago
I think the answer is D. The replication factor is 6 since there's 1 primary, 3 secondary, and 1 arbiter.
IL
Ilene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
You're welcome!
RO
Roxane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
NI
Nida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
No, the correct answer is B. The replication factor is 3 because only the secondaries count towards replication factor.
AL
Aleta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
I think the answer is D. The replication factor is 6 since there's 1 primary, 3 secondary, and 1 arbiter.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I think the answer is C) 04, because the hidden secondary and arbiter do not count towards the replication factor.
LI
Linette 1 year ago
The replication factor is 4, because we count the primary and the visible secondaries.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel