MENU
Which type of identity is created when you register an application with Active Directory (Azure AD)?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium SC-900 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
When you register an application through the Azure portal, an application object and service principal are automatically created in your home directory or tenant.
14 comments · newest first
NA
Nana
12 months ago
I always get confused with these options, but I think it's D.
AD
Adolph
1 year ago
Wait, are you sure it's not just a user account?
JU
Judy
1 year ago
Nope, it's a system-assigned managed identity!
JE
Jettie
1 year ago
I thought it was a user-assigned managed identity?
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
It's definitely a service principal!
TY
Ty
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought registering an app might create a user account, but that doesn’t seem right now.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
I feel like the answer is definitely a service principal, since it’s how Azure identifies applications, right?
AD
Adria
1 year ago
I think when you register an app with Azure AD, it creates a service principal, but I'm not entirely sure.
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about managed identities, but I can't recall if it's user-assigned or system-assigned in this context.
LI
Lili
1 year ago
The query seems straightforward, but I'm not sure if I'm fully understanding the relationship between the documents and the update. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
TO
Tomoko
1 year ago
I know Arista uses some kind of proprietary documentation, but I can't remember the exact name. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.
TR
Trina
1 year ago
I think thermal fatigue is related to temperature changes, so I'm leaning towards option A.
BO
Bobbie
1 year ago
I remember something about zone synchronization from the lab exercises, so I think option A makes sense to try first.
KR
Kristofer
1 year ago
Vulnerability scanning could be a good starting point, but I'm worried it might miss some more sophisticated vulnerabilities. I'm leaning towards manual penetration testing - it might take more time, but I think it would be the most comprehensive approach.