Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-401 Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the users shown in the following table.Which users will Microsoft Purview insider risk management flag as potential high-impact users?
D) User1, User2, User3, and User4
A) User1 and User2 only
B) User2 and User3 only
C) User1, User2, and User3 only

Microsoft SC-401 Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-401 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All SC-401 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the users shown in the following table.

Which users will Microsoft Purview insider risk management flag as potential high-impact users?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management flags high-impact users based on various risk factors, including role, access to confidential data, and influence within an organization. Let's analyze each user:

User1 (Regional Manager, assigned Reader role, manages department managers)

Risk Factors:

Holds a managerial position (regional manager).

Manages multiple department managers, indicating organizational influence.

Access to critical business information.

Flagged? -Yes (Managerial role and access to confidential data).

User2 (HR department manager, no Microsoft Entra roles, manages HR department users)

Risk Factors:

Manages HR department users, meaning they likely handle sensitive employee data.

HR roles are often considered high-risk due to access to personal and payroll data.

Flagged? -Yes (HR role and access to sensitive employee data).

User3 (Developer, reports to User2, only user in compliance, assigned Compliance Administrator role)

Risk Factors:

Compliance Administrator role grants access to sensitive security and regulatory data.

Only person in the compliance department, meaning they hold a critical role.

Potentially high impact on compliance and security settings.

Flagged? -Yes (Privileged Compliance Administrator role).

User4 (Assistant to User1, no Entra roles, handles confidential data on behalf of User1)

Risk Factors:

Handles a high volume of confidential data on behalf of a regional manager.

Assistants with access to sensitive data are considered insider risk candidates.

Flagged? -Yes (High access to sensitive information).

Since all four users fit high-impact criteria (managerial roles, privileged compliance access, handling sensitive data), Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management will flag all of them.


by Jestine at Mar 19, 2025, 10:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-401 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Amira
9 months ago
Totally agree, User1 and User2 make sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
I think User2 and User3 are the ones flagged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
10 months ago
Definitely User1, User2, and User3!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
10 months ago
Wait, all four users? That seems too much!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's User1 and User2 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
10 months ago
I feel like all users could be flagged, so maybe D is the right choice. I just can’t remember the specific thresholds we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m uncertain if User4 has any impact based on the criteria we discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
11 months ago
I think it might be User1 and User2 only, but I also recall a practice question where User3 was involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
11 months ago
I remember studying insider risk management, but I'm not sure how to determine which users are flagged. It feels like a tricky question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
11 months ago
I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the user's job title, access level, and any other risk factors mentioned in the table. That should help me determine the most likely high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. What exactly are the criteria for being flagged as a high-impact user? I'll need to research that before I can confidently answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking which users will be flagged as potential high-impact, so I need to analyze each user's attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the user details and the Purview insider risk management criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
1 year ago
Option C, baby! The more users you flag, the better. It's like a game of 'Spot the Insider Risk' - the more pieces on the board, the higher your chances of winning!
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. The more users we flag, the better our chances of catching any insider risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
I think Option C is the way to go. Let's flag all three users for potential high-impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caren
1 year ago
This is a no-brainer. User1, User2, and User3 are the obvious choices. I'm surprised they even included User4 as an option - that's just a distraction, right?
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
1 year ago
That makes sense, thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
1 year ago
So the answer would be C) User1, User2, and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
I agree, User4 seems like a distraction in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 year ago
User1, User2, and User3 are definitely the potential high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
1 year ago
That's right! User1, User2, and User3 are the ones Microsoft Purview insider risk management will flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 year ago
So, the correct answer would be C) User1, User2, and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 year ago
I agree, User4 seems like a distraction in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
1 year ago
User1, User2, and User3 are definitely the potential high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
I think it's User1, User2, and User3 only because they have access to sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
D, of course! Why wouldn't they flag all four users? It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to insider risk management, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think it might be User2 and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
2 years ago
I agree with Marla, User1 and User2 seem to be the potential high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 years ago
Gotta be option C. Those three users have the most sensitive information and permissions. Microsoft Purview will definitely flag them as potential high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
1 year ago
It makes sense that those three users would be flagged. They have the most sensitive information, so they are the most likely to be considered high-impact users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
1 year ago
Yeah, User1, User2, and User3 are the ones with the highest risk factors. Microsoft Purview will likely flag them for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most logical choice. Those users definitely have access to critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marla
2 years ago
I think it's User1 and User2 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
2 years ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'd say User1, User2, and User3 since they seem to have the highest level of access and privileges.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be User2 and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
2 years ago
I think it's User1 and User2 only, based on their roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 years ago
I agree, User1, User2, and User3 seem to have the most access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel