Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Your company has an Azure subscription that has enhanced security enabled for Microsoft Defender for Cloud.The company signs a contract with the United States government. You need to review the current subscription for NIST 800-53 compliance. What should you do first?
D) From Defender for Cloud, enable Defender for Cloud plans.
A) From Defender for Cloud, review the Azure security baseline for audit report.
B) From Defender for Cloud, review the secure score recommendations.
C) From Azure Policy, assign a built-in initiative that has a scope of the subscription.

Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 9
[All SC-100 Questions]

Your company has an Azure subscription that has enhanced security enabled for Microsoft Defender for Cloud.

The company signs a contract with the United States government. You need to review the current subscription for NIST 800-53 compliance. What should you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Kanisha at Mar 19, 2024, 05:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Skye
10 months ago
I thought we needed to assign an initiative before anything else?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Agreed, secure score gives a clear path to compliance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure enabling Defender plans is necessary right away?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
10 months ago
I think reviewing the Azure security baseline is more important first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
10 months ago
Definitely start with the secure score recommendations!
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
11 months ago
Enabling Defender for Cloud plans sounds important, but I wonder if we should focus on compliance reviews before that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
11 months ago
I feel like assigning a built-in initiative from Azure Policy could be a good move, but I can't recall if that's the very first action we should take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question where we had to look at secure score recommendations first. Could that be relevant here too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
11 months ago
I think we might need to start by checking the Azure security baseline, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the first step for NIST compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
11 months ago
I'm a little unsure if reviewing the secure score recommendations or enabling Defender for Cloud plans is the right approach here. I think I'll start with the Azure security baseline audit report and go from there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report in Defender for Cloud seems like the logical first step to understand the current compliance posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to first review the Azure security baseline for audit report in Defender for Cloud. That will give me a good overview of the current compliance status against the NIST 800-53 standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. Should I be looking at the secure score recommendations in Defender for Cloud or assigning a built-in initiative through Azure Policy? I'll need to review the details of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about reviewing NIST 800-53 compliance. I think I'll start by reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report in Defender for Cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, but I'm not sure which one will best meet the customer's needs. I'll have to carefully read through each choice to make the right recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how the government plays a key role as an external stakeholder in our last class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
12 months ago
I think image lazy loading might help improve the rendering times, but does it really apply to GIFs when they are scrolling?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
12 months ago
The key here is to identify the two selling advantages of using Expedition. I'll need to read the options closely and choose the best two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'm thinking we could try increasing the number of parallel jobs to speed things up, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
I'll go with option C. Auditing the current security baseline is the logical first step before adding any new compliance standards. Can't build on a shaky foundation, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
1 year ago
Adding a regulatory compliance standard in Defender for Cloud is a good idea, but I think it makes more sense to start by reviewing the existing baseline first.
upvoted 0 times
Elliot
1 year ago
That sounds like a logical approach. Let's start by reviewing the baseline and then proceed accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
Once we have a clear understanding of the current state, we can then add a regulatory compliance standard if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I agree, reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report should be the first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
1 year ago
Reviewing the Azure security baseline for audit report is a solid choice. That should give me a clear picture of how the current setup measures up to the NIST standard.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
1 year ago
That sounds like a good plan. Checking the baseline will definitely help ensure NIST compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
1 year ago
C) From Defender for Cloud, review the Azure security baseline for audit report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 year ago
A) From Defender for Cloud, review the secure score recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renay
1 year ago
Configuring the Microsoft Defender for Cloud data connector in Sentinel could be useful, but it doesn't seem directly relevant to reviewing NIST 800-53 compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
The secure score recommendations seem like a good place to start. That's probably the quickest way to get an overview of the current security posture.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
1 year ago
D) From Defender for Cloud, add a regulatory compliance standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
1 year ago
C) From Defender for Cloud, review the Azure security baseline for audit report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
B) From Microsoft Sentinel, configure the Microsoft Defender for Cloud data connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 year ago
A) From Defender for Cloud, review the secure score recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 year ago
I think we should also review the Azure security baseline for audit report to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
1 year ago
I agree with Lashawna. It's important to prioritize security compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 year ago
I think we should review the secure score recommendations first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel