MENU
You need to recommend a solution to meet the security requirements for the InfraSec group.
What should you use to delegate the access?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SC-100 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
XU
Xuan
5 days ago
D is too high-level for this scenario.
CH
Cherrie
10 days ago
C could work, but it’s not as targeted as B.
HE
Herman
15 days ago
A subscription feels too broad. We need specific access.
YU
Yuonne
20 days ago
Agreed! RBAC allows precise access control.
TA
Tabetha
25 days ago
I think B is the best choice. Custom RBAC roles are flexible.
SH
Sherron
1 month ago
Right! Let's go with B for better security.
DO
Dottie
1 month ago
Custom roles can be tailored to their needs.
ED
Edna
1 month ago
Plus, it aligns with security best practices.
MI
Mitsue
2 months ago
B gives us the granularity we need for InfraSec.
YO
Youlanda
2 months ago
Exactly! We need to focus on specific permissions.
SH
Sherron
2 months ago
D is for higher-level management. Not suitable here.
DO
Dottie
2 months ago
C could work, but it limits scope.
ED
Edna
2 months ago
A subscription seems too broad. Not specific enough.
MI
Mitsue
2 months ago
Agreed! RBAC allows precise access control.
YO
Youlanda
3 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Custom RBAC roles are flexible.
ME
Merilyn
3 months ago
Wait, can RBAC really handle all the security needs? Sounds risky!
NA
Nakisha
3 months ago
I thought a resource group would be enough, but maybe not?
ST
Stephaine
3 months ago
A subscription? That seems too broad for delegation.
VI
Viki
3 months ago
Totally agree, RBAC gives fine-grained access!
AM
Amos
3 months ago
B) a custom role-based access control (RBAC) role is the best choice.
FR
Francis
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards a subscription, but I recall that it might not provide the specific delegation we need for security requirements.
IN
Inocencia
5 months ago
Management groups seem like they could be useful for broader access, but I feel like they might not be specific enough for the InfraSec group's needs.
RO
Ronald
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where a resource group was the answer, but that was more about organizing resources, not security.
AN
Anabel
6 months ago
I think we might need a custom RBAC role since it allows for more granular permissions, but I'm not entirely sure.