Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-100 Exam - Topic 15 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 15
[All SC-100 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription. You have an Azure subscription.

You need to implement a Microsoft Purview communication compliance solution for Microsoft Teams and Yammer. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Assign compliance policies to Microsoft 365 groups based on custom Microsoft Exchange Online attributes.

* Minimize the number of compliance policies

* Minimize administrative effort

What should you include in the solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Andra at Nov 23, 2023, 11:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elroy
6 months ago
C is the best option, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, administrative units seem easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure adaptive scopes can handle custom Exchange attributes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
7 months ago
Definitely agree with C! It really minimizes admin effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
7 months ago
I think adaptive scopes (C) are the way to go for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
7 months ago
I keep mixing up Azure AD Information Protection labels and Microsoft 365 Defender user tags. I don't think either fits this scenario perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
7 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to minimize policies. Adaptive scopes could be the right choice for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think administrative units might help with managing compliance policies, though they seem more focused on user management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
8 months ago
I remember adaptive scopes being mentioned in our study materials, especially for targeting specific groups based on attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
8 months ago
Adaptive scopes seem like the way to go here. That should allow us to easily assign policies based on the custom attributes while keeping things simple on the admin side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between adaptive scopes and administrative units. I'll need to research those options more to determine the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. Assigning policies based on custom Exchange attributes sounds like we need to use adaptive scopes. That could help minimize the number of policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and think through the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
8 months ago
I think I remember learning about this in one of my classes. Let me try to recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll break down the key parts of the statement and evaluate whether I think the overall claim is accurate based on my understanding of the topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure how the organization's vision statement or cost-benefit analysis would apply to evaluating a story. I'll have to re-read the question carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
8 months ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is it possible that the answer could be C. Let? I'm not totally sure how that would work, but it seems like it might fit the requirements. I'll have to double-check the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky 802.1X question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the device's authentication process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
2 years ago
Aha! I think the solution lies in option C, adaptive scopes. These allow you to dynamically assign policies based on attributes, which sounds like exactly what we need here. Plus, it minimizes the number of policies and administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
2 years ago
You know, I was thinking about option B, Microsoft 365 Defender user tags. But then I realized that's more for security and threat detection, not really compliance. So that's not the right answer either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
2 years ago
Okay, let's break this down. We need to assign compliance policies to Microsoft 365 groups based on custom Exchange Online attributes. That rules out option A, since Azure AD Information Protection labels are not tied to Exchange attributes.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
2 years ago
C) adaptive scopes
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 years ago
D) administrative units could help with minimizing administrative effort
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
2 years ago
D) administrative units
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 years ago
C) adaptive scopes could potentially help fulfill the requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
2 years ago
C) adaptive scopes
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
2 years ago
B) Microsoft 365 Defender user tags are not based on Exchange Online attributes
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 years ago
B) Microsoft 365 Defender user tags
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tran
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. We need to find a solution that meets the specific requirements, while minimizing the number of policies and administrative effort. Let me think about this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel