Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-900 Exam - Topic 20 Question 96 Discussion

Posted by Edelmira on Jul 02, 2024 at 11:27 AM

You build a custom Al Builder model and use it in Power Automate cloud flows. Users report that they are not able to use the model in their flows. You need to allow users to access the model in their flows. Which action should you perform on the model?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium PL-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
JO
Josefa 11 months ago
Wait, I didn't know you had to share it first!
CH
Charlette 11 months ago
Sharing makes sense, but why not just edit it?
CE
Celestina 11 months ago
I thought publishing was the way to go?
LE
Lettie 12 months ago
Definitely agree, sharing is key here!
CH
Charlesetta 12 months ago
You need to share the model for others to use it.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards publishing the model, but I also recall something about sharing it in a similar scenario. It's a bit confusing!
SH
Sharmaine 1 year ago
I feel like editing the model wouldn't help users access it. Maybe sharing is the way to go?
JO
Jolene 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to publish a model for users to access it. Could that be the answer here?
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
I think we might need to share the model with users, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right step.
VI
Virgina 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. The key is to focus on the problem statement - the users can't access the model. So we need to do something to make the model available to them. Sharing or publishing seem like the most likely options.
SA
Sarah 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is "edit" the same as "share"? Or is there a difference between those two options? I'll need to think it through carefully.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it! The users can't access the model, so we need to publish it so they can use it. That's gotta be the right answer.
DO
Dominga 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the answer is to share the model, so that users can access it in their flows. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
ME
Merlyn 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and what they might mean in the context of the AI Builder model.
LU
Lucina 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The 5S approach is all about creating standardized processes, so I'm going to go with A. Standardizing.
MO
Mose 1 year ago
I think I've seen a paperclip icon used for attachments in other email clients, so I'll try looking for that.
AR
Armanda 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. A project team directory would just list the team members, not show their relationships. The scope statement and charter are more high-level documents. I'm going to go with B, the project organization chart.
TI
Tiera 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The WWPN is a Fibre Channel identifier, so the answer has to be FCoE, which is Fibre Channel over Ethernet.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
This question looks similar to one we practiced in class about retrieving data from an API. I think option B is the go-to for getting the latitude and longitude.
KA
Kanisha 2 years ago
I bet the model is so advanced, it's become self-aware and is holding the users hostage! Quick, someone call the AI whisperer!
LA
Lawrence 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
C) train
SE
Selma 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
B) share
LE
Lelia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
A) edit
EL
Elfrieda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
C) train
HA
Hana 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
B) share
GL
Glenn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
A) edit
VE
Velda 2 years ago
I believe both sharing and publishing the model would be necessary for users to access it in their flows.
RO
Rodrigo 2 years ago
B) share is the way to go, for sure. Sharing is caring, and in this case, it's the key to letting the users access the model. Easy peasy!
CH
Chana 2 years ago
But shouldn't we also publish the model so that it can be used by others?
HE
Hector 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe A) edit? If the users are having trouble, there might be some configuration issues that need to be addressed. Editing the model could help fix that.
TA
Tayna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Hector
B) share
OR
Oretha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Hector
A) edit
VA
Vanda 2 years ago
D) publish seems more appropriate. I mean, if the users can't use the model, it's probably because it's not been published yet, right? Gotta make that model public before they can access it.
YE
Yesenia 2 years ago
I agree with Kimberely, sharing the model would allow users to access it in their flows.
CO
Corinne 2 years ago
B) share seems like the obvious choice here. Why would we need to edit or train the model if the users can't even access it? Sharing the model is the way to go!
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
Let's go ahead and share the model with the users to resolve the issue.
DA
Danica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
Sharing the model makes sense, it will give users the access they need.
PA
Paola 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
Agreed, sharing the model is the best option to allow users to use it in their flows.
PA
Pansy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
I think we should share the model with the users so they can access it.
PA
Pansy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
B) share
VA
Vallie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Corinne
A) edit
KI
Kimberely 2 years ago
I think we should share the model with the users.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel