New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-900 Exam - Topic 14 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-900 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 14
[All PL-900 Questions]

You are building a Power Virtual Agents chatbot for a company.

You are working with an existing topic and would like to call an action.

Which technology is available to perform the action?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Paz at May 09, 2022, 10:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Keva
4 months ago
Not sure about that, seems too easy with just one option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
4 months ago
Wait, can Power Bl even do that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
Power Automate is the way to go, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
5 months ago
I thought it was Power Apps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
5 months ago
Definitely Power Automate for actions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
I definitely recall that Power Automate is used for workflows, so it seems like the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought Power Apps could also be used for actions, but I guess it’s more about building apps, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think Power Automate was the right choice for integrating actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
5 months ago
I think we can use Power Automate to call actions in the chatbot, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
5 months ago
Hmm, not sure if a REST call from Apex is the best approach here. I'm thinking a Queueable job might be a better way to handle the asynchronous nature of the integration and ensure the Account is still created even if the ERP call fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen questions like this before, but I want to double-check my understanding. The tricky part is distinguishing between the data being deleted versus the table structure remaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not totally clear on what a "structured approach to induction" really means in this context. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like it was about bridging in symmetric IRB. Could that be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the wording of the question. It says the company is "ready to shut down its DR site and resume normal operations." That tells me the first step is to perform a failback to the primary site. The other options don't quite fit the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel