Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-500 Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-500 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 3
[All PL-500 Questions]

You need to resolve the issue reported with the RailStatusUpdater flow.

What are two possible ways to achieve the goal? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

According to the scenario, the RailStatusUpdater flow sometimes fails because of network issues that prevent it from running a desktop flow on a machine. To resolve this issue, you can use one of these two methods:

Put the desktop flow action into a Do until loop that runs until the desktop flow is successful. This way, the cloud flow will retry running the desktop flow until it succeeds or reaches a maximum number of attempts.

Create a duplicate action for the desktop flow and configure the duplicate action to run if the first desktop flow action fails. This way, the cloud flow will have a second chance to run the desktop flow if the first attempt fails.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tamesha
2 months ago
I'm just glad they didn't ask us to debug the RailStatusUpdater flow itself. That would have been a real train wreck!
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to handle desktop flow failures. I say, if in doubt, add more flows! The more the merrier, I always say.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
1 months ago
B) Call a separate child cloud flow to perform the desktop flow a second time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 months ago
A) Put the desktop flow action into a Do until loop. Run until the desktop flow is successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casey
2 months ago
A seems a bit too simple. A do-until loop might work, but it feels like a bandaid solution. I'd prefer a more robust approach like B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
D is a good choice too. Running the desktop flow twice can help ensure the issue is resolved, especially if the first attempt fails.
upvoted 0 times
Maxima
21 days ago
D is a good choice too. Running the desktop flow twice can help ensure the issue is resolved, especially if the first attempt fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
1 months ago
D) Create a duplicate action for the desktop flow to run after the first desktop flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 months ago
B) Call a separate child cloud flow to perform the desktop flow a second time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
2 months ago
A) Put the desktop flow action into a Do until loop. Run until the desktop flow is successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
3 months ago
That's a valid point, Maynard. Having a duplicate action as a fail-safe could definitely help in resolving the issue with the RailStatusUpdater flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better. Creating a duplicate action for the desktop flow and configuring it to run if the first one fails provides a backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
3 months ago
I think option A is a good idea. Putting the desktop flow action into a Do until loop seems like a logical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
4 months ago
I think B and C are the best options. Calling a separate child cloud flow or creating a duplicate action for the desktop flow gives us more control over the flow execution.
upvoted 0 times
Alyssa
2 months ago
I agree, having a backup plan with a separate child cloud flow or duplicate action is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
C) Create a duplicate action for the desktop flow and configure the duplicate action to run if the first desktop flow action fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
3 months ago
B) Call a separate child cloud flow to perform the desktop flow a second time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel