Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-500 Exam - Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-500 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 2
[All PL-500 Questions]

You are building automations within Microsoft Power Platform for Contoso.

The automations have the following key requirements:

* A single parent automation is already configured. The automation must be used to trigger an additional child automation.

* The parent automation already exists within the ContosoAutomations solution. The existing child automation is outside of the solution.

* All automations must be deployed together.

* No dependency on physical compute environments is allowed.

You need to configure the automations.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Willis at Mar 06, 2025, 05:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Herschel
5 months ago
C is the best option, we need to keep it organized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
5 months ago
Definitely need to keep everything in the same solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
Surprised that we can't just link them without moving!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
5 months ago
I disagree, recreating the parent flow seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
6 months ago
A connection reference is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
6 months ago
I’m confused about the deployment requirement. If we delete the child flow, will we still be able to deploy everything together?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
6 months ago
Deleting the parent flow seems risky. I feel like we should keep it and find a way to integrate the child without losing the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
6 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to recreate a flow in the same solution. Could that apply here with the child flow?
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
6 months ago
I think we might need to use a connection reference, but I'm not entirely sure how that works with the existing child automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
6 months ago
Based on the requirements, I think option A, using a connection reference, is the best approach. That way I can keep the parent flow in the solution and connect to the external child flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the "no dependency on physical compute environments" part. Does that mean I can't use a custom connector or something? I'll need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key seems to be that the parent automation is already in the solution, but the child is not. I think using a connection reference might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements to make sure I understand the constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 year ago
Gotta love those 'no physical compute environments' requirements. Keeps things nice and cloud-y. Connection reference is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
1 year ago
I think removing the parent flow from the ContosoAutomations solution might be the best option to maintain consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 year ago
I'm with Junita on this one. Deleting flows and starting from scratch? What a waste of time. Connection reference for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Bette
12 months ago
C) Delete the child flow. Recreate it in the ContosoAutomations solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
1 year ago
B) Delete the parent flow. Recreate it outside of the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
1 year ago
A) Use a connection reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
1 year ago
Haha, deleting the parent flow and starting over? What is this, amateur hour? A connection reference is definitely the way to go. Efficiency is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
Deleting and recreating the flows is such a hassle. Who wants to do all that extra work? A connection reference is clearly the best option to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Jennifer
12 months ago
Deleting and recreating the flows is such a hassle. Who wants to do all that extra work? A connection reference is clearly the best option to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
A) Use a connection reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristina
1 year ago
I agree with Flo, it's important to keep all automations together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
A connection reference seems like the way to go here. It allows you to reference the external child automation without having to recreate it in the same solution. Keeps things nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
1 year ago
D) Remove the parent flow from the ContosoAutomations solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
1 year ago
That's right! Using a connection reference will allow you to link the external child automation to the parent automation without having to move it into the same solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 year ago
A) Use a connection reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to delete the child flow and recreate it in the ContosoAutomations solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
1 year ago
I think we should use a connection reference.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel