New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 8 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 8
[All PL-400 Questions]

A travel company plans to track the address of places their clients visit in an entity named Destination. Client

information is captured as contact records. Client records include links to the places that clients visit.

The company must be able to link multiple rating records to the new address record.

You find a custom Rating entity that is incomplete.

You need to expand the Rating entity to include contact, address, and rating information in one place.

Which three actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/common-data-service/map-entity-fields

by Dick at May 05, 2022, 05:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Valda
4 months ago
Not sure if we need a mapping for Destination -- Rating, sounds redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
4 months ago
Agree with D, it makes the most sense for tracking ratings!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
5 months ago
Wait, why not just link everything to Destination instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
5 months ago
I think the Address to Rating relationship is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
5 months ago
Definitely need that 1:N relationship between Contact and Rating!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
I vaguely remember something about mapping relationships, so maybe we should create a mapping for Contact and Rating too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C for the relationship between Address and Rating, but I can't recall if Destination should be involved directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about linking entities, and I feel like we definitely need to connect Rating to Address somehow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
5 months ago
I think we need to create a relationship between Contact and Rating, but I'm not sure if it's 1:N or N:1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is enabling CloudTrail the right approach here? I'm not sure if that would give us the level of detail we need for analyzing traffic patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. A data custodian is responsible for the overall management and protection of the data, so I'm guessing the correct answer is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know WPA2 enterprise uses some kind of authentication server, but I can't remember if it's RADIUS or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Can someone clarify what "physically separated infrastructure" means in this context? That's an important detail I want to understand before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
5 months ago
I remember learning about the Kano model in class. I believe the category with the linear relationship is the performance attributes, but I'll double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel