MENU
A company designs a solution for use in an international organization.
The solution must provide multiple Ul languages and currencies.
You need to move components to include them as part of the solution.
Which three component types can you move? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Suggested Answer: A, C, E
Get Premium PL-400 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TU
Tu
11 months ago
Not sure about scheduled power automate flows being part of this.
RO
Rodrigo
11 months ago
Totally agree with you all, available UI languages are a must!
CO
Cora
11 months ago
Wait, can you really move currencies enabled in the environment?
AM
Amira
12 months ago
I think modified standard security roles can be moved too.
SH
Sheridan
12 months ago
Custom entity is definitely movable!
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
I feel like scheduled power automate flows might not be included, but I can't recall the specifics.
YE
Yen
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about currencies enabled in the environment. Can we actually move those components?
SH
Shaquana
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think available UI languages are part of the solution too.
ON
Oneida
1 year ago
I think custom entities can definitely be moved, but I'm not sure about the modified security role.
LO
Lorriane
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the components that are specifically mentioned in the requirements, like UI languages and currencies. I'll select those and see if I can get the full three points.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "move components"? I'll need to make sure I understand that before I start selecting my answers.
ED
Edna
1 year ago
Alright, I've got a strategy here. I'll start by identifying the components that are directly related to the requirements of multiple UI languages and currencies. That should give me a good starting point.
ER
Ernest
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different components that can be moved to include them in the solution.
LE
Lenna
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the component types that can be moved, and it's worth one point for each correct answer. I'll need to analyze the options carefully.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of cost accounting principles. I feel confident I can apply the concepts we've learned to select the correct answer here.
BO
Bonita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm thinking it could be either Stakeholder or Business requirements. I'll have to think it through carefully.
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
When we practiced similar questions, it seemed like a license issue could also prevent configuration changes, but I can't recall the specifics.
DI
Diane
2 years ago
I agree with Gracie, those components will ensure the solution is flexible and user-friendly.
CH
Chantell
2 years ago
That makes sense, those components are essential for international use.
GR
Gracie
2 years ago
I believe we can move custom entity, currencies enabled in the environment, and available Ul languages as part of the solution.
CH
Chantell
3 years ago
I think we need to include multiple Ul languages and currencies in the solution.
GE
Georgene
3 years ago
Right? That's a hard pass from me. I'll stick with the safe bets - cus entities, currencies, and UI languages. Can't go wrong with those.
TY
Ty
3 years ago
Haha, yeah no kidding. 'Hey, we had to modify your standard security role to make this work.' I'm sure that would go over real well.
CH
Charlena
3 years ago
I agree with you both. Those three options make the most sense. Although, I have to say, 'modified standard security role' just sounds like a recipe for disaster. Can you imagine trying to explain that one to the client?
CH
Chantell
3 years ago
Can you imagine trying to explain that one to the client?
NO
Noble
3 years ago
'modified standard security role' just sounds like a recipe for disaster.
LU
Luisa
3 years ago
I agree with you both. Those three options make the most sense.
MA
Makeda
3 years ago
E) available Ul languages
FR
Fredric
3 years ago
B) modified standard security role
SV
Svetlana
3 years ago
A) custom entity
RO
Rolland
3 years ago
Yep, that's what I was thinking too. Those seem to be the components that would be relevant for a solution needing to support multiple languages and currencies.