Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam

Question #: 72
Topic #: 5

[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to handle errors in UpdateRecord.js.

Which code segment should you add at line UR06?

Acatch(error) {
alert('Caught error: ' + error.message);}

BException exception = Server.GetLastError() ;
if(exception != null)}

Ccatch(exception e){
console.writeline(e)}

Dfunction (error){
console.log(error.message)}

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Alex at Apr 23, 2023, 11:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Walton

10 months ago

A definitely gives a clear alert for errors, love it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

10 months ago

Wait, why is there a "writeline" in C? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonja

11 months ago

C looks like a syntax error to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

11 months ago

I disagree, I think D is more straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jody

11 months ago

Option A is the best choice for handling errors in JavaScript.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lovetta

11 months ago

I feel like option D is close, but it doesn't seem to follow the correct syntax for error handling in JavaScript.

upvoted 0 times

...

Halina

11 months ago

I remember practicing with similar questions, and I think using 'catch' is essential, but I'm unsure if C or D is better for logging.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B is more related to server-side error handling, which might not fit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

11 months ago

I think option A looks familiar; it seems like the standard way to catch errors in JavaScript.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherri

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The term for pay that is based on commission is "variable pay". So the answer is option D - "At risk pay".

upvoted 0 times

...

Effie

12 months ago

Ah, the MITRE ATT&CK framework - I remember learning about that in my security classes. I think the key benefit is that it helps security teams understand the common attack patterns, which can then be used to improve defenses. Option A sounds like the best fit to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

12 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the specific wording of the question - it's asking about a sequence of end items for customer orders in a make-to-order or assemble-to-order environment. That sounds like it's describing a "final assembly schedule" to me. I'll go with B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phung

1 year ago

Ah, the age-old question of how to handle errors in JavaScript. Maybe we should just throw the computer out the window and start over.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

1 year ago

Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if logging the error message is enough. Shouldn't we also handle the error in some way?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

1 year ago

Haha, Option C is a classic! 'console.writeline'? Really? That's so old-school, it's almost funny.

upvoted 0 times

Elinore

1 year ago

Johna: We should definitely go with Option A for handling errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

1 year ago

User 3: I agree, it's kind of funny to see that in the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, 'console.writeline' is ancient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

1 year ago

User 1: Option C is definitely outdated.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Johna

1 year ago

I'm not sure about Option B. Checking for the last error on the server seems like an outdated approach. I'd go with something more modern.

upvoted 0 times

Lawrence

1 year ago

I prefer Option A as well. It's always good to catch errors and display a message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

1 year ago

I think Option C could also work. It's important to handle errors properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

1 year ago

I agree, Option B does seem outdated. I would go with Option A instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Leslie

1 year ago

Option A looks good to me. Alerting the user about the error is a simple and straightforward way to handle it.

upvoted 0 times

Miles

1 year ago

User3: Yeah, I prefer straightforward solutions like that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

1 year ago

User2: I agree, it's a simple and effective way to handle errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lottie

1 year ago

User1: I think Option A is the way to go. Alerting the user about the error is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Jody

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think Option A is the best choice because it catches the error and displays a message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

1 year ago

I agree with Jaime. Option A looks like the correct code segment to handle errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

1 year ago

I think we should add a try-catch block at line UR06.

upvoted 0 times

...