Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 5
[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to handle errors in UpdateRecord.js.

Which code segment should you add at line UR06?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Alex at Apr 23, 2023, 11:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Walton
5 months ago
A definitely gives a clear alert for errors, love it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
6 months ago
Wait, why is there a "writeline" in C? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
6 months ago
C looks like a syntax error to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
6 months ago
I disagree, I think D is more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
6 months ago
Option A is the best choice for handling errors in JavaScript.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
6 months ago
I feel like option D is close, but it doesn't seem to follow the correct syntax for error handling in JavaScript.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
6 months ago
I remember practicing with similar questions, and I think using 'catch' is essential, but I'm unsure if C or D is better for logging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B is more related to server-side error handling, which might not fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
7 months ago
I think option A looks familiar; it seems like the standard way to catch errors in JavaScript.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The term for pay that is based on commission is "variable pay". So the answer is option D - "At risk pay".
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
7 months ago
Ah, the MITRE ATT&CK framework - I remember learning about that in my security classes. I think the key benefit is that it helps security teams understand the common attack patterns, which can then be used to improve defenses. Option A sounds like the best fit to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
7 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the specific wording of the question - it's asking about a sequence of end items for customer orders in a make-to-order or assemble-to-order environment. That sounds like it's describing a "final assembly schedule" to me. I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
11 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to handle errors in JavaScript. Maybe we should just throw the computer out the window and start over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
11 months ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if logging the error message is enough. Shouldn't we also handle the error in some way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
Haha, Option C is a classic! 'console.writeline'? Really? That's so old-school, it's almost funny.
upvoted 0 times
Elinore
9 months ago
Johna: We should definitely go with Option A for handling errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
9 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's kind of funny to see that in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, 'console.writeline' is ancient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
User 1: Option C is definitely outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johna
11 months ago
I'm not sure about Option B. Checking for the last error on the server seems like an outdated approach. I'd go with something more modern.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
10 months ago
I prefer Option A as well. It's always good to catch errors and display a message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
10 months ago
I think Option C could also work. It's important to handle errors properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
11 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem outdated. I would go with Option A instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
12 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Alerting the user about the error is a simple and straightforward way to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
Miles
11 months ago
User3: Yeah, I prefer straightforward solutions like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
11 months ago
User2: I agree, it's a simple and effective way to handle errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
12 months ago
User1: I think Option A is the way to go. Alerting the user about the error is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jody
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think Option A is the best choice because it catches the error and displays a message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
1 year ago
I agree with Jaime. Option A looks like the correct code segment to handle errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
I think we should add a try-catch block at line UR06.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel