Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 5

[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to modify Microsoft flow to resolve CustornerCs issue. What should you do?

AAdd a data operation that specifies the false conditions.

BAdd a configure run that is set to Is successful.

CAdd a timeout setting to the approval flow.

DAdd b condition containing approval hierarchy.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Scenario: CustomerC requested additional information from the parts department through the customer survey and has not received a response one week later.

Imagine having a process where you want to give someone a couple of days to reply to an approval. If that someone doesn't respond in time, you want to assign a new approval to another person or group of people. To achieve this you can set the timeout in the action settings.

https://www.o365dude.com/2018/06/02/timeout-flow-approvals/

by Francine at May 07, 2022, 05:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dierdre

4 months ago

B is definitely a solid option if you want to ensure success!

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

4 months ago

Wait, is adding a timeout really necessary? Sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaquana

4 months ago

C could be useful, but not sure if it directly resolves the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

5 months ago

I disagree, A seems more straightforward for handling false conditions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

5 months ago

I think option D is the best choice for approval flows.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

5 months ago

I vaguely remember something about approval hierarchies being important, but I can't decide if that's the right approach for this specific problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

5 months ago

I feel like adding a timeout setting could be useful, but I can't recall if it directly relates to resolving customer issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryll

5 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar, like we practiced setting conditions for successful runs in our last session.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

5 months ago

I remember we discussed adding conditions in flows, but I'm not sure if it was about false conditions or approval hierarchies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

5 months ago

Amazon SageMaker has some great built-in algorithms that could be useful here, like k-means for clustering the data. I'd explore those options as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I think the layout being consistent is probably one of the answers, but I'm not sure about the other one. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dylan

5 months ago

I'm not totally sure about this one. The options seem a bit vague, and I'm not completely familiar with the different phases. I'll have to make an educated guess and hope for the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ma

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The balance of payments could be a few different things based on these answer choices. I'll have to think it through carefully and try to remember what we covered in class about this topic.

upvoted 0 times

...