Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 48 Discussion

You need to modify Microsoft flow to resolve CustornerCs issue. What should you do?
C) Add a timeout setting to the approval flow.
A) Add a data operation that specifies the false conditions.
B) Add a configure run that is set to Is successful.
D) Add b condition containing approval hierarchy.

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 5
[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to modify Microsoft flow to resolve CustornerCs issue. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Scenario: CustomerC requested additional information from the parts department through the customer survey and has not received a response one week later.

Imagine having a process where you want to give someone a couple of days to reply to an approval. If that someone doesn't respond in time, you want to assign a new approval to another person or group of people. To achieve this you can set the timeout in the action settings.


https://www.o365dude.com/2018/06/02/timeout-flow-approvals/

by Francine at May 07, 2022, 05:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dierdre
10 months ago
B is definitely a solid option if you want to ensure success!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
10 months ago
Wait, is adding a timeout really necessary? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
11 months ago
C could be useful, but not sure if it directly resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
11 months ago
I disagree, A seems more straightforward for handling false conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
11 months ago
I think option D is the best choice for approval flows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
11 months ago
I vaguely remember something about approval hierarchies being important, but I can't decide if that's the right approach for this specific problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
11 months ago
I feel like adding a timeout setting could be useful, but I can't recall if it directly relates to resolving customer issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
11 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, like we practiced setting conditions for successful runs in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
11 months ago
I remember we discussed adding conditions in flows, but I'm not sure if it was about false conditions or approval hierarchies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
11 months ago
Amazon SageMaker has some great built-in algorithms that could be useful here, like k-means for clustering the data. I'd explore those options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I think the layout being consistent is probably one of the answers, but I'm not sure about the other one. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
11 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. The options seem a bit vague, and I'm not completely familiar with the different phases. I'll have to make an educated guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The balance of payments could be a few different things based on these answer choices. I'll have to think it through carefully and try to remember what we covered in class about this topic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel