New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 5 Question 125 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 125
Topic #: 5
[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to modify the Power Automate flow to resolve CustomerC's issue.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Scenario: CustomerC requested additional information from the parts department through the customer survey and has not received a response one week later.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/sequential-modern-approvals

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Margarett
15 days ago
B sounds like it could complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
20 days ago
Isn't option A too vague?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
25 days ago
I think option C makes the most sense for approvals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 month ago
Haha, I bet CustomerC is really frustrated with this issue. Time to bring in the approval hierarchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 month ago
The approval hierarchy is definitely the way to go. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 month ago
B) A data operation with false conditions might not be the best solution for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
D) Adding a timeout setting to the approval flow could be a good idea to prevent the issue from dragging on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 months ago
C) Add a condition containing approval hierarchy seems like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
2 months ago
Adding a configure run sounds familiar, but I’m not confident it directly addresses CustomerC's issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 months ago
I feel like we had a similar question where we had to specify conditions. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 months ago
I think adding a condition for approval hierarchy could be relevant, but I'm not entirely sure if that's what they mean by resolving the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
2 months ago
I've worked with similar issues before, so I think I have a good handle on this. My initial thought would be to go with option D and add a timeout setting to the approval flow. That could help ensure the issue is resolved in a timely manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. I would probably start by looking at option C, adding a condition with an approval hierarchy. That seems like it could be a good way to address the customer's issue, but I'd want to make sure I fully understand how that would work within the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
3 months ago
I remember we practiced a question about modifying flows, but I can't recall if adding a timeout setting is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Approval hierarchy is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
3 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'd want to make sure I fully understand the customer's issue and the current flow setup before deciding on the best approach. Maybe I'd start by reviewing the flow and the available options to see which one seems like the most appropriate solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
3 months ago
I disagree, D could help with timing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which option would be the best approach. I might need to do some additional research or consult with a colleague to get a better understanding of the flow and the customer's issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
4 months ago
I think I would start by looking at the flow and understanding the current setup. Then I'd consider the different options and try to determine which one best addresses the customer's issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel