Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 1

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Use the maker portal to export the custom connector. Then use the maker portal to import the connector into the production environment.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Marion at Aug 29, 2024, 04:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Salena

3 months ago

Wait, can you really restrict access like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

3 months ago

Yes, that's how you do it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulina

4 months ago

Definitely needs to be tested first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

4 months ago

I think it might not work as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

4 months ago

That sounds like a solid plan!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

4 months ago

I believe this solution should work, but I have a nagging doubt about whether it truly limits access to just our tenant users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

5 months ago

I feel like using the maker portal is the right approach, but I wonder if there are additional settings needed for production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

5 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to ensure visibility for specific users. This seems similar, but I can't recall the exact steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Artie

5 months ago

I think exporting and importing the connector sounds right, but I'm not sure if it maintains the tenant restrictions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused. The solution seems simple enough, but the question mentions that there might be more than one correct solution. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and see if there are any other approaches I should consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is making sure the connector is only accessible to users in the tenant. I'll need to look into the access controls and permissions when I import it into the production environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question says the connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant, but the solution doesn't mention anything about that. I'll need to double-check the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

5 months ago

This seems straightforward. I'll just follow the steps in the solution and export the connector from the maker portal, then import it into the production environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yen

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to double-check the requirements to make sure I get the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

1 year ago

I see your point, but I still think using the maker portal for export and import is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yasuko

1 year ago

I'm not sure, maybe there could be a better way to ensure visibility and accessibility only to users in the tenant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Polly

1 year ago

I agree with Marjory, it seems like the right approach to deploy the custom connector.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

1 year ago

This solution sounds straightforward, but I hope the exam doesn't ask us to 'move fast and break things' with our production environments!

upvoted 0 times

Tommy

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

1 year ago

I hope so too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

2 years ago

Ah, the old 'move it to production and see what happens' strategy. Bold move, let's see how this plays out!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

2 years ago

I think the solution is to export and import the custom connector using the maker portal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 years ago

Wait, we can't just move it to production like that, can we? Shouldn't we test it first to make sure everything works as expected?

upvoted 0 times

Skye

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Sean

2 years ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

2 years ago

Looks good to me! Exporting and importing the connector through the maker portal seems like a simple and effective way to get it deployed.

upvoted 0 times

Eladia

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Peter

1 year ago

That's correct. It's a straightforward process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

2 years ago

This solution seems straightforward, but I wonder if there are any additional security considerations we need to take into account when moving the connector to production.

upvoted 0 times

Tamie

1 year ago

Yes, but we should also review the permissions and access controls to make sure everything is secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

1 year ago

Using the maker portal to export and import the connector seems like a good start.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

1 year ago

Agreed, we need to ensure that only users in the tenant can access the connector.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

2 years ago

I think we should consider additional security measures before moving the connector to production.

upvoted 0 times

...