Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 133 Discussion

You need to modify the Power Automate flow to resolve CustomerC's issue.What should you do?
D) Add a timeout setting to the approval flow.
A) Add a configure run that is set to is successful.
B) Add a data operation that specifies the false conditions.
C) Add a condition containing approval hierarchy.

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 133 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 133
Topic #: 1
[All PL-400 Questions]

You need to modify the Power Automate flow to resolve CustomerC's issue.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Scenario: CustomerC requested additional information from the parts department through the customer survey and has not received a response one week later.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-automate/sequential-modern-approvals

by Alexia at May 02, 2026, 12:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Werner
4 days ago
But what if the approval takes too long?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
9 days ago
I feel like option C covers more bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
14 days ago
Exactly, clarity in the flow is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
20 days ago
True, but we need to ensure all conditions are met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
25 days ago
Option B might complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
30 days ago
Option A seems too simple for a complex issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 month ago
I agree, but option D could help with delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 month ago
I think option C is the best choice. Approval hierarchy is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
2 months ago
Adding a timeout could really streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
Wow, I didn't even consider B, that could be useful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
2 months ago
Isn't A just a basic step? Seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
2 months ago
I disagree, D could help prevent delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
2 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for approvals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
I feel like specifying false conditions in a data operation could be relevant, but I need to double-check if that aligns with the flow's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
4 months ago
Adding a timeout setting sounds familiar, but I wonder if it really addresses the core issue CustomerC is facing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about configuring runs, but I can't recall if setting it to "is successful" would actually fix CustomerC's problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
4 months ago
I think adding a condition with an approval hierarchy could help streamline the process, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option for resolving the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel