Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 4 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 4
[All PL-200 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to is. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company uses a Dataverse environment. The environment is accessed from canvas and model-driven apps.

The Dataverse environment contains a table that has the following columns:

* Name

* Company

* Contacted On

The company requires that the table not contain any duplicate rows when users create data in the environment. You need to implement a solution that meets the requirement.

Solution: Create an alternate key for the columns.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shenika
4 days ago
You make a good point, Lynsey. Either solution would work, but the unique index might be a more straightforward approach. I guess it really depends on the specific requirements and the overall design of the Dataverse environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
5 days ago
I'm a bit skeptical about this solution. Wouldn't it be simpler to just add a unique index on the columns instead of creating an alternate key? That might be a more efficient way to handle this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
6 days ago
Yeah, I agree. The question is pretty clear, and this solution addresses the requirement of not having any duplicate rows. I don't see any issues with this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
7 days ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. Creating an alternate key for the columns to enforce uniqueness is a reasonable solution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel