New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 12 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 12
[All PL-200 Questions]

You plan to implement Microsoft Dataverse.

You must track changes for two columns in the Account table. You must maintain a historical log of changes for the two columns and track only what is necessary. You configure the appropriate organization settings.

You need to configure the system to track changes for the two columns.

Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

By setting the IsAuditEnabled property of a table's definition and the IsAuditEnabled property of each desired column's definition to true, data changes to records of those tables can be logged by the platform.

Note: There are three levels where auditing can be configured: organization, table, and column. The organization level is the highest level, followed by the table level, and finally the column level. For column auditing to take place, auditing must be enabled at the column, table, and organization levels. For table auditing to take place, auditing must be enabled at the table and organization levels.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/developer/data-platform/configure-entities-attributes-auditing

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Allene
4 months ago
I agree, both auditing options seem like the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
4 months ago
Wait, can you really track changes for just two columns? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
Change tracking for the Account table? Not sure if that's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
I think enabling auditing for the specific columns is a must too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
5 months ago
Definitely need to enable auditing for the Account table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
I feel like enabling change tracking for the two specific columns could be a good choice, but I’m a bit confused about when to use auditing versus change tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
5 months ago
I think change tracking is also an option, but I can't recall if it applies to the columns or just the table. We had a practice question about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
I remember we discussed auditing in class, so I think enabling auditing for the Account table is definitely one of the actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we might need to enable auditing for the specific columns too, right? That seems important for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
5 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about undo tablespaces in my database class. I think I have a good handle on this topic, so I'll go through the options methodically and select the ones I'm confident are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
5 months ago
I think configuring the security group for the ECS instance might be essential. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. Futures and forwards are both binding contracts, and futures can be traded on exchanges, so I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I believe net income is tied to financial capital maintenance, while comprehensive income relates to physical capital. Hope I got it right!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel