Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 11 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 11

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to is. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company uses a Dataverse environment. The environment is accessed from canvas and model-driven apps.

The Dataverse environment contains a table that has the following columns:

* Name

* Company

* Contacted On

The company requires that the table not contain any duplicate rows when users create data in the environment. You need to implement a solution that meets the requirement.

Solution: Create an alternate key for the columns.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Glen at Feb 09, 2024, 04:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rodrigo

1 day ago

Totally agree, that should work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

7 days ago

Creating an alternate key is a solid way to prevent duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

14 days ago

I feel like there might be other ways to handle duplicates, but this option seems like a straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phyliss

19 days ago

I'm a bit confused about how alternate keys function in Dataverse. Do they really stop duplicates, or just warn about them?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

24 days ago

I remember a practice question where we had to ensure uniqueness, and using an alternate key was the solution. It seems like it could work here too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslee

1 month ago

I think creating an alternate key could prevent duplicates, but I'm not entirely sure if it covers all scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loise

1 month ago

I'm a little confused by this question. Preventing duplicates is important, but I'm not sure if creating an alternate key is the best solution. I'll need to review the Dataverse documentation to see if there are other options I should consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmad

1 month ago

Okay, let's break this down. The requirement is to prevent duplicate rows, and the solution suggests creating an alternate key. That makes sense to me - the alternate key will ensure that each combination of Name, Company, and Contacted On is unique. I think this is the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derrick

1 month ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Alternate keys are used to uniquely identify rows, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to prevent duplicates. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

1 month ago

Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. Creating an alternate key for the columns should prevent duplicate rows, so I'm pretty confident that this solution will meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

1 month ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about what "Reviewable Items" might include.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

1 month ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the --alternative command-line option is a real thing or just a made-up option in the question. I'll have to think this through more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rose

1 month ago

I'm a little confused by this one. Is there some nuance I'm missing? I'll have to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

1 month ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between the fields mentioned in the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

1 month ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I know we can use the run object to access the logs, but I'm not sure which method is the best approach. Maybe I'll try both the get_metrics() and get_details_with_logs() methods and see which one provides more useful information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

1 year ago

So, the consensus is that the solution of creating an alternate key is the right approach to prevent duplicate rows in the Dataverse environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

1 year ago

If the solution is implemented correctly, it should meet the company's requirement of not allowing duplicate rows in the table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 year ago

I think as long as the alternate key is properly enforced in the database, it should still prevent duplicates regardless of the entry method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

1 year ago

But what if users try to enter duplicate data through other means? Will the solution still work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

1 year ago

I agree with Carey. Having an alternate key for the columns is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 year ago

Yes, creating an alternate key for the columns should prevent any duplicate rows from being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 year ago

Agreed. The alternate key seems like a good way to ensure data quality in the Dataverse environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

1 year ago

In that case, I would say the solution meets the goal. It's essential for the company to maintain data integrity and avoid duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 years ago

I believe the alternate key will enforce uniqueness at the database level, so it should prevent any duplicate rows from being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

2 years ago

But what if the users still try to input duplicate data? Will the solution prevent it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

2 years ago

I agree with Ty. It's important to prevent duplicate rows in the table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 years ago

I think the solution meets the goal because creating an alternate key for the columns can help enforce uniqueness.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

2 years ago

Ooh, a validation rule, that's a smart idea! Though maybe we could also look into using Power Automate to trigger a check for duplicates. That could be a neat solution.

upvoted 0 times

Elliott

2 years ago

Ooh, a validation rule, that's a smart idea! Though maybe we could also look into using Power Automate to trigger a check for duplicates. That could be a neat solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

2 years ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

2 years ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

2 years ago

Hmm, good point. Maybe we could create a custom validation rule that checks for duplicate records before allowing the data to be saved. That could work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicki

2 years ago

Yeah, I agree with that. Alternate keys won't stop users from creating duplicate rows. We need some kind of unique constraint or business rule to enforce the no-duplicates requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

2 years ago

I'm not sure this solution meets the goal. Alternate keys are used to uniquely identify records, but they don't prevent duplicate rows from being created. We'd need a different solution to enforce uniqueness on the combination of those three columns.

upvoted 0 times

...