Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 11 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 11

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to is. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company uses a Dataverse environment. The environment is accessed from canvas and model-driven apps.

The Dataverse environment contains a table that has the following columns:

* Name

* Company

* Contacted On

The company requires that the table not contain any duplicate rows when users create data in the environment. You need to implement a solution that meets the requirement.

Solution: Create an alternate key for the columns.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Glen at Feb 09, 2024, 04:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hailey

11 months ago

So, the consensus is that the solution of creating an alternate key is the right approach to prevent duplicate rows in the Dataverse environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

12 months ago

If the solution is implemented correctly, it should meet the company's requirement of not allowing duplicate rows in the table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

12 months ago

I think as long as the alternate key is properly enforced in the database, it should still prevent duplicates regardless of the entry method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

1 years ago

But what if users try to enter duplicate data through other means? Will the solution still work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

1 years ago

I agree with Carey. Having an alternate key for the columns is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 years ago

Yes, creating an alternate key for the columns should prevent any duplicate rows from being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 years ago

Agreed. The alternate key seems like a good way to ensure data quality in the Dataverse environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

1 years ago

In that case, I would say the solution meets the goal. It's essential for the company to maintain data integrity and avoid duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

1 years ago

I believe the alternate key will enforce uniqueness at the database level, so it should prevent any duplicate rows from being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

1 years ago

But what if the users still try to input duplicate data? Will the solution prevent it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

1 years ago

I agree with Ty. It's important to prevent duplicate rows in the table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

1 years ago

I think the solution meets the goal because creating an alternate key for the columns can help enforce uniqueness.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

1 years ago

Ooh, a validation rule, that's a smart idea! Though maybe we could also look into using Power Automate to trigger a check for duplicates. That could be a neat solution.

upvoted 0 times

Elliott

1 years ago

Ooh, a validation rule, that's a smart idea! Though maybe we could also look into using Power Automate to trigger a check for duplicates. That could be a neat solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

1 years ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

1 years ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

1 years ago

Hmm, good point. Maybe we could create a custom validation rule that checks for duplicate records before allowing the data to be saved. That could work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicki

1 years ago

Yeah, I agree with that. Alternate keys won't stop users from creating duplicate rows. We need some kind of unique constraint or business rule to enforce the no-duplicates requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

1 years ago

I'm not sure this solution meets the goal. Alternate keys are used to uniquely identify records, but they don't prevent duplicate rows from being created. We'd need a different solution to enforce uniqueness on the combination of those three columns.

upvoted 0 times

...