Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 1

You are creating a Power Automate cloud flow. The cloud flow will create several SharePoint Online list items based on a variety of conditions.

If any of the dependent SharePoint Online actions fail, you must revert the changes while the automation runs.

You need to design the cloud flow to meet the requirement.

Which two actions should you implement for the design? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

ASet Run After to Has failed

BAdd a scope.

CPerform a changeset request action.

DRetrigger the flow run.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, B, C, C

by Amira at Nov 21, 2025, 04:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bok

15 days ago

Yes, A and B together ensure smooth rollback on errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Craig

20 days ago

I feel like option D is a bit overkill. Retriggering isn't always needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

25 days ago

Option C seems unnecessary. Changeset requests complicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

1 month ago

Agreed, but I also like option B. A scope can group actions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 month ago

I think option A is crucial. It helps manage failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

2 months ago

Yeah, but that doesn't really fix the issue, does it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

I thought retriggering the flow was the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

2 months ago

Wait, can you really revert changes automatically?

upvoted 0 times

...

Xenia

2 months ago

Adding a scope is a must too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

2 months ago

Definitely need to set Run After to Has failed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ayesha

3 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trick us with all these options. B and C are the real deal though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Basilia

3 months ago

A and B for sure. Gotta have that rollback capability if things go wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lachelle

3 months ago

Retriggering the flow seems like it could be useful, but I wonder if that's really the right approach for handling failures in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

3 months ago

I feel like the changeset request action might be relevant, but I don't have a clear example in my notes to back that up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

3 months ago

I think adding a scope could be important for grouping actions, but I can't recall if it's necessary for reverting changes specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

4 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense. And the changeset request action seems important to ensure the list items are created as a single transaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

4 months ago

Okay, let's break this down. I think the key is using a scope to group the SharePoint actions, and then setting the "Run After" property on that scope to handle failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Retriggering the flow run seems like it could lead to more issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

4 months ago

I remember we discussed using the "Set Run After" feature in class, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fallon

4 months ago

B and C are the way to go. Scope is essential for rollback, and changeset is the key to transactional updates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the combination of the scope, "Run After" settings, and changeset request should give us the control we need to meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...