U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

You are creating a Power Automate cloud flow. The cloud flow will create several SharePoint Online list items based on a variety of conditions.If any of the dependent SharePoint Online actions fail, you must revert the changes while the automation runs.You need to design the cloud flow to meet the requirement.Which two actions should you implement for the design? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
B) Add a scope. and B) Add a scope. and C) Perform a changeset request action. and C) Perform a changeset request action.
A) Set Run After to Has failed
A) Set Run After to Has failed
D) Retrigger the flow run.
D) Retrigger the flow run.

Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 1
[All PL-200 Questions]

You are creating a Power Automate cloud flow. The cloud flow will create several SharePoint Online list items based on a variety of conditions.

If any of the dependent SharePoint Online actions fail, you must revert the changes while the automation runs.

You need to design the cloud flow to meet the requirement.

Which two actions should you implement for the design? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, B, C, C

by Amira at Nov 21, 2025, 04:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bok
3 months ago
Yes, A and B together ensure smooth rollback on errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
3 months ago
I feel like option D is a bit overkill. Retriggering isn't always needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
3 months ago
Option C seems unnecessary. Changeset requests complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
3 months ago
Agreed, but I also like option B. A scope can group actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
3 months ago
I think option A is crucial. It helps manage failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
4 months ago
Yeah, but that doesn't really fix the issue, does it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
4 months ago
I thought retriggering the flow was the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
4 months ago
Wait, can you really revert changes automatically?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
4 months ago
Adding a scope is a must too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
Definitely need to set Run After to Has failed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trick us with all these options. B and C are the real deal though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
5 months ago
A and B for sure. Gotta have that rollback capability if things go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
5 months ago
Retriggering the flow seems like it could be useful, but I wonder if that's really the right approach for handling failures in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
5 months ago
I feel like the changeset request action might be relevant, but I don't have a clear example in my notes to back that up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
5 months ago
I think adding a scope could be important for grouping actions, but I can't recall if it's necessary for reverting changes specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
6 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. And the changeset request action seems important to ensure the list items are created as a single transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
6 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. I think the key is using a scope to group the SharePoint actions, and then setting the "Run After" property on that scope to handle failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about D. Retriggering the flow run seems like it could lead to more issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
6 months ago
I remember we discussed using the "Set Run After" feature in class, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
6 months ago
B and C are the way to go. Scope is essential for rollback, and changeset is the key to transactional updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the combination of the scope, "Run After" settings, and changeset request should give us the control we need to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
7 months ago
Combining A and B makes sense. It covers failure and organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the "revert the changes" part. Do we need to undo any successful list item creations if one of the actions fails?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different actions and how they might work together to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Kathrine
2 months ago
Combining those actions should cover the requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
2 months ago
Setting Run After to Has failed seems crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
2 months ago
Agreed! But we also need to handle failures properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 months ago
I think adding a scope is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
This is definitely a challenge!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel