New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-900 Exam - Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-900 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 2
[All MS-900 Questions]

A company uses Microsoft 36S.

The company requires that you implement least privileged access.

You need to recommend solutions that meet the requirements.

Which two solutions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Nelida at Jun 17, 2022, 09:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Andra
4 months ago
Wait, are people really using PAW devices? That’s new to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
4 months ago
Definitely agree with JIT access, but PAW devices seem overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
4 months ago
Not sure about IP address range restrictions, feels a bit limiting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
4 months ago
I think device compliance is also crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
5 months ago
Just-in-time (JIT) access is a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
Privileged Access Workstations (PAW) devices were mentioned in a practice question; they seem like a solid choice for enhancing security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
IP address range restrictions seem relevant, but I feel like they might not fully enforce least privilege on their own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think device compliance could also help in restricting access based on device security status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
5 months ago
I remember studying about Just-in-time (JIT) access; it definitely aligns with the least privilege principle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question says we need to display pending tasks for each individual, and it's for a single specific application. I'm thinking option B, "Tasks attributed to user," might be the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to identify the new records from the existing ones, so I'm leaning towards option B - defining a record type for the interns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about option A. Transferring resources back to operational areas seems like the logical step when winding down a temporary Programme Office.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
5 months ago
There was a question similar to this in practice where we discussed thickness and compound structure, but I'm not 100% sure if that's right for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
5 months ago
I remember studying about OpenStack, but I don't think it specifically uses HTTP in the way this question is asking.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel