MENU
You work as a Microsoft 365 Administrator for your company. All users have Microsoft 365 licenses.
Users frequently collaborate by using private chats in Microsoft Teams.
You need to ensure that a single user is unable to permanently delete private chats.
Which of the following should you configure?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium MS-700 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To preserver electronically store information (ESI), you can put selected users or all users on legal hold to make sure that all message interchange are discoverable by the organization's compliance manager or teams admins. This has to be done in the Microsoft 365 Compliance center, creating a case to set the legal hold.
12 comments · newest first
DO
Dorian
12 months ago
B won't help with chat deletion, just meetings!
KA
Karrie
1 year ago
Definitely going with C, it’s the safest option.
ST
Stanton
1 year ago
Wait, can you really stop someone from deleting chats?
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
I think A could work too, but not sure.
DO
Dortha
1 year ago
C is the right choice! Litigation hold prevents deletion.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
I feel like the litigation hold option makes the most sense here since it’s about preserving data, but I’m not completely confident.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage user permissions, but I can't recall if sensitivity labels can prevent chat deletion.
CO
Cornell
1 year ago
I think a meeting policy is more about managing meetings, not chat deletion. That doesn't seem right.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
I remember something about litigation holds being used to prevent deletion of emails, but I'm not sure if it applies to Teams chats too.
JA
James
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is D - intentional over estimation of costs and/or under estimation of revenue in a budget.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I remember studying FVC and FEV1 values, and I think that if FEV1 is significantly low compared to FVC, it suggests an obstructive defect, right?
LE
Leanna
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to focus on the areas where the scope is certain and estimate those first. Then, as more information comes in, we can update the rest of the estimate. Gotta start somewhere, right?