Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 17 Question 41 Discussion

You work as a Microsoft 365 Administrator for your company. All users have Microsoft 365 licenses.Users frequently collaborate by using private chats in Microsoft Teams.You need to ensure that a single user is unable to permanently delete private chats.Which of the following should you configure?
C) A litigation hold on the user's mailbox.
A) The user's Microsoft 365 license options in the Microsoft 365 Admin Center.
B) A meeting policy in Microsoft Teams.
D) A Sensitivity Label in the Security & Compliance Admin Center.

Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 17 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-700 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 17
[All MS-700 Questions]

You work as a Microsoft 365 Administrator for your company. All users have Microsoft 365 licenses.

Users frequently collaborate by using private chats in Microsoft Teams.

You need to ensure that a single user is unable to permanently delete private chats.

Which of the following should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To preserver electronically store information (ESI), you can put selected users or all users on legal hold to make sure that all message interchange are discoverable by the organization's compliance manager or teams admins. This has to be done in the Microsoft 365 Compliance center, creating a case to set the legal hold.


by Barrett at May 03, 2022, 08:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dorian
10 months ago
B won't help with chat deletion, just meetings!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
10 months ago
Definitely going with C, it’s the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
11 months ago
Wait, can you really stop someone from deleting chats?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
11 months ago
I think A could work too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
11 months ago
C is the right choice! Litigation hold prevents deletion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
11 months ago
I feel like the litigation hold option makes the most sense here since it’s about preserving data, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage user permissions, but I can't recall if sensitivity labels can prevent chat deletion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
11 months ago
I think a meeting policy is more about managing meetings, not chat deletion. That doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
I remember something about litigation holds being used to prevent deletion of emails, but I'm not sure if it applies to Teams chats too.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is D - intentional over estimation of costs and/or under estimation of revenue in a budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
I remember studying FVC and FEV1 values, and I think that if FEV1 is significantly low compared to FVC, it suggests an obstructive defect, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is to focus on the areas where the scope is certain and estimate those first. Then, as more information comes in, we can update the rest of the estimate. Gotta start somewhere, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel