Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 13 Question 12 Discussion

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.Your company has a Microsoft 365 subscription.You need to prevent a user named User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft Teams.Solution: You create an In-Place Hold for the Microsoft OneDrive for Business site of User1.Does this meet the goal?
B) No
A) Yes

Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 13 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-700 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 13
[All MS-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company has a Microsoft 365 subscription.

You need to prevent a user named User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft Teams.

Solution: You create an In-Place Hold for the Microsoft OneDrive for Business site of User1.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Private chats are stored in user mailboxes, not on OneDrive.


by Tarra at May 04, 2022, 09:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosalind
10 months ago
Seems like a missed opportunity for better chat retention!
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
Nope, it’s specific to files, not chats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
11 months ago
Wait, I thought In-Place Hold covered everything in M365?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
11 months ago
Totally agree, this won't stop chat deletions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
11 months ago
In-Place Hold only applies to OneDrive, not Teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I think the answer is "No." I remember discussing how OneDrive holds don’t apply to Teams chat data. It’s a tricky area!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
11 months ago
I recall that to manage chat retention, we might need to look into compliance settings specifically for Teams. This solution seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the In-Place Hold is more about files rather than chats. I practiced a question similar to this, and it focused on Teams settings instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
11 months ago
I think creating an In-Place Hold for OneDrive might not actually prevent chat deletions in Teams. I remember something about chat retention policies being more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I know Cisco has some kind of PnP (Plug and Play) service, but I'm not familiar with the specific server name. I'll have to guess and hope I get lucky, or try to find the information in my study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't the ternary operator supposed to return the first part if the condition is true, and the second part if it's false? I'm not sure I fully understand how this is working.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the solution of running the Grant-CsTeamsUpgradePolicy cmdlet and specifying the -PolicyName parameter might be the right approach. But I'll double-check the details to make sure it aligns with the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel