Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 11 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-700 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 11
[All MS-700 Questions]

Your company uses Teams.

You plan to deploy Teams to a branch office that has limited bandwidth.

Which Two features can he used when the Teams client has a bandwidth restriction of 150 kilobit/s up and 150 kilobit/s down? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lanie
4 months ago
Not sure if D will hold up with such limited bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
4 months ago
Totally agree, A and E are the best choices here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
Surprised that screen sharing (D) is even an option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
4 months ago
I think B is a no-go with that speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
Definitely A and E! Those work well with low bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
5 months ago
I recall that screen sharing can work, but I can't remember if it’s better than audio in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like one-to-one video might struggle with that bandwidth limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
5 months ago
I think audio during meetings is definitely a safe choice, but I'm a bit uncertain about screen sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
I remember that Teams can optimize for low bandwidth, but I'm not sure if video is a good option at 150 kbps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
I've got a good strategy here. I'll go with the one-to-one features and avoid anything that requires a lot of video or high bandwidth. That should give me the best chance of getting this right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to read through it a few times to make sure I understand exactly what they're asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think one-to-one screen sharing and audio during meetings would be good options to conserve bandwidth. I'll make sure to select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The bandwidth limits are pretty low, so I'll need to carefully consider which features won't use too much data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the bandwidth restrictions and think about which Teams features would work best in that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to specify the name, but I can't remember if we also need to include the data type or not. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about how address summarization reduces routing table size. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 years ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. We need to choose the features that can work within that strict bandwidth limit. I'm going with options E and D - audio and screen sharing during meetings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 years ago
Definitely no video in this scenario! That would eat up too much bandwidth. I'm thinking the one-to-one seen sharing and audio during meetings would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
2 years ago
I think the key here is to focus on the features that are lightweight and don't require a lot of bandwidth. Screen sharing and audio during meetings seem like safe bets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'm not sure if I should go for the one-to-one options or the meeting-based ones. That bandwidth restriction is really tight.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel