Microsoft MS-700 Exam - Topic 10 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-700 exam

Question #: 85
Topic #: 10

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company has a Microsoft 365 subscription.

You need to prevent a user named User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft Teams.

Solution: You place the mailbox of User1 on Litigation Hold.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

To restrict external Teams communication for both calling and personal chat to only organizational users that use the microsoft.com domain, you need to use the Teams admin center to configure the external access settings. Here are the steps to follow:

In the left navigation, go to Org-wide settings > External access.

Under External access, turn on the toggle for Users can communicate with other Skype for Business and Teams users.

Under Cross-tenant access settings, click Manage settings.

In the Cross-tenant access settings pane, under Calling and chat, select Allow specific domains and then enter microsoft.com in the box below. This will allow your users to communicate with Microsoft users via calling and chat.

Click Save.

Note: You also need to make sure that microsoft.com has configured their external access settings to allow communication with your domain. See Communicate with users from other organizations for more details.

by Vi at Dec 27, 2023, 05:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daniela

3 months ago

Definitely meets the goal, good solution!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

3 months ago

Wait, can you really do that? Sounds odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

4 months ago

Isn't Litigation Hold just for emails?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carole

4 months ago

I don't think that's enough, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

4 months ago

Yes, that would prevent deletion!

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

4 months ago

I thought Litigation Hold was mainly for emails, so I’m leaning towards "No" for this one, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

4 months ago

I feel like this is similar to another question we had about data retention, but I can't recall if Litigation Hold covers Teams specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

I remember a practice question where we discussed chat retention policies. Maybe there's a specific setting for Teams that we need to consider?

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

5 months ago

I think putting User1's mailbox on Litigation Hold might prevent deletion of emails, but I'm not sure if it applies to Teams chats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

5 months ago

I think putting the user's mailbox on Litigation Hold is a good start, but I'm not sure if that's the complete solution. I'll need to explore other options to ensure private chats in Teams are fully protected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

5 months ago

Placing the user's mailbox on Litigation Hold seems like a reasonable solution, but I'm not confident that it will meet the goal of preventing them from permanently deleting private chats in Teams. I'll need to research this further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glennis

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not familiar with the specifics of how Litigation Hold works in this scenario. I'll need to review the documentation to see if that's the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

5 months ago

I'm not sure if putting the user's mailbox on Litigation Hold will prevent them from deleting private chats in Teams. I'll need to double-check the details on how Litigation Hold works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The RTE is responsible for leading the Agile Release Train, so I'm guessing the practices should focus on that. C sounds like the best option to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm pretty sure Proof of Work doesn't guarantee consensus, since there can still be forks in the blockchain. I'll explain that in my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ranee

5 months ago

Okay, let me break this down. The question is asking if the underlined text is correct. Since it says "Administrators" group, that seems right to me. I don't think any of the other options like "Remote Management users" or "Remote Desktop users" would work for installing the Intune client. I'm going with "No change is needed" on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

10 months ago

Ah, the good old 'Litigation Hold' trick. It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but hey, at least it gets the job done... sort of.

upvoted 0 times

Amina

9 months ago

User1: It's a bit extreme, but I guess it works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

9 months ago

User2: Yeah, that's one way to stop you from deleting chats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

9 months ago

User1: I heard they put my mailbox on Litigation Hold.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

9 months ago

User2: Yeah, it's a bit extreme, but it does the job.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amalia

9 months ago

User1: I heard they're putting my mailbox on Litigation Hold.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

10 months ago

Haha, placing someone's mailbox on Litigation Hold to prevent them from deleting private chats? That's like using a nuclear weapon to kill a fly. There must be a more targeted solution for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

10 months ago

A) Yes, placing the mailbox on Litigation Hold will retain all data, including private chats, and meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiera

10 months ago

This solution doesn't seem right. Litigation Hold is more for preserving data for legal reasons, not for managing user permissions in Teams. I think there might be a better way to achieve the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

10 months ago

B) No, placing the mailbox on Litigation Hold does not prevent User1 from deleting private chats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

11 months ago

A) Yes, that should meet the goal of preventing User1 from permanently deleting private chats.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

11 months ago

Placing User1's mailbox on Litigation Hold will prevent them from permanently deleting private chats in Teams, but it's not the right solution. Litigation Hold is for legal purposes, not for preventing accidental deletions.

upvoted 0 times

Gary

9 months ago

Correct, placing the mailbox on Litigation Hold is not the appropriate solution for preventing User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft Teams.

upvoted 0 times

...