Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MS-102 Topic 2 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 2
[All MS-102 Questions]

Your network contains three Active Directory forests. There are forests trust relationships between the forests.

You create a Microsoft Entra tenant

You plan to sync the on-premises Active Directory to the Microsoft Entra tenant.

You need to recommend a synchronization solution. The solution must ensure that the synchronization can complete and as quickly as possible if a single server fails.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mirta
2 months ago
That makes sense. Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
2 months ago
Hey, I heard you can synchronize your Active Directory with your Microsoft Entra tenant using a magic wand and a handful of fairy dust. Option A just sounds like the most practical solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
13 days ago
Option A does seem like the most practical choice for synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
16 days ago
Option A) one Microsoft Entra Connect sync server and one Microsoft Entra Connect sync server in staging mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
Because having three sync servers will ensure redundancy and one in staging mode for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 months ago
Why do you think option B is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
I'm just impressed you have three Active Directory forests to manage. That must be one heck of an IT department! As for the question, I think option D is the most robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
Wynell
3 hours ago
Option D sounds like the best choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
4 days ago
Definitely, we need to make sure the synchronization keeps running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
8 days ago
I agree, redundancy is key in case of server failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
23 days ago
Yeah, having three forests to manage keeps us on our toes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
Option D sounds like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
I'm with Leonida on this one. The multiple sync servers and staging mode should give us the failover we need. Plus, it's always good to have a backup plan, right? Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the staging mode servers. Wouldn't it be better to just have six sync servers and let them handle the load? Option C seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mable
29 days ago
That's a good point. Maybe a combination of both options would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
But wouldn't having three sync servers in staging mode help with failover in case one server goes down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
1 months ago
I think option C makes sense. Having six sync servers would distribute the load better.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
2 months ago
Wow, three Active Directory forests? That's a lot of data to sync. I think option D is the way to go - three sync servers and three in staging mode should give us the redundancy and speed we need.
upvoted 0 times
Buck
2 months ago
Yeah, option D seems like the most reliable solution for syncing the data from three Active Directory forests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
2 months ago
I agree, having three sync servers and three in staging mode should ensure the synchronization completes quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. It provides redundancy and speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel