New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 2
[All MS-102 Questions]

Your network contains three Active Directory forests. There are forests trust relationships between the forests.

You create a Microsoft Entra tenant

You plan to sync the on-premises Active Directory to the Microsoft Entra tenant.

You need to recommend a synchronization solution. The solution must ensure that the synchronization can complete and as quickly as possible if a single server fails.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Shala at Mar 20, 2025, 10:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julio
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it balances performance and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
3 months ago
I think D is better for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
3 months ago
Staging mode? Isn't that just for testing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
3 months ago
Wait, why would you need six servers? That seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
Option B seems solid with three sync servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
4 months ago
I thought we needed at least three active servers to handle the load, but I’m not certain if that’s the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
4 months ago
I feel like the answer might be option B, but I’m a bit confused about how many staging servers we actually need for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where having one server in staging mode was mentioned, but I can't recall the exact number of active servers needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having redundancy in sync servers, but I'm not sure if three is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option B with three regular and one staging mode sync servers is the best approach to meet the requirements. The staging server can take over if one of the regular ones fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to have enough redundancy to handle a single server failure, so I'm leaning towards option D with three regular and three staging mode sync servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the regular and staging mode sync servers. I'll need to review the details on those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around ensuring the synchronization can complete quickly even if a single server fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
11 months ago
That makes sense. Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
11 months ago
Hey, I heard you can synchronize your Active Directory with your Microsoft Entra tenant using a magic wand and a handful of fairy dust. Option A just sounds like the most practical solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
10 months ago
Option A does seem like the most practical choice for synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
10 months ago
Option A) one Microsoft Entra Connect sync server and one Microsoft Entra Connect sync server in staging mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
Because having three sync servers will ensure redundancy and one in staging mode for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
11 months ago
Why do you think option B is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I'm just impressed you have three Active Directory forests to manage. That must be one heck of an IT department! As for the question, I think option D is the most robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
Rupert
9 months ago
Definitely, better safe than sorry when it comes to syncing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
9 months ago
It's always good to have backups in case one server fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
9 months ago
I agree, having three sync servers and three in staging mode seems like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
9 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
Definitely, we need to make sure the synchronization keeps running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
10 months ago
I agree, redundancy is key in case of server failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
10 months ago
Yeah, having three forests to manage keeps us on our toes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Option D sounds like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
11 months ago
I'm with Leonida on this one. The multiple sync servers and staging mode should give us the failover we need. Plus, it's always good to have a backup plan, right? Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the staging mode servers. Wouldn't it be better to just have six sync servers and let them handle the load? Option C seems more straightforward to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mable
10 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe a combination of both options would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
10 months ago
But wouldn't having three sync servers in staging mode help with failover in case one server goes down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
11 months ago
I think option C makes sense. Having six sync servers would distribute the load better.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
12 months ago
Wow, three Active Directory forests? That's a lot of data to sync. I think option D is the way to go - three sync servers and three in staging mode should give us the redundancy and speed we need.
upvoted 0 times
Buck
11 months ago
Yeah, option D seems like the most reliable solution for syncing the data from three Active Directory forests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
11 months ago
I agree, having three sync servers and three in staging mode should ensure the synchronization completes quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
11 months ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. It provides redundancy and speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel