Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MS-102 Topic 11 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 11
[All MS-102 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription.

You plan to implement records management and enable users to designate documents as regulatory records.

You need to ensure that the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible when you create retention labels.

What should you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kassandra
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I thought Microsoft 365 E5 already had all the regulatory compliance features built-in. Guess I need to brush up on my Office 365 knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
France
1 days ago
C) Run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
6 days ago
B) Create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
9 days ago
A) Configure custom detection rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. Custom detection rules could be used to identify the regulatory records, making it easier to apply the retention labels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is D. The Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet is probably just a made-up option to confuse us. Microsoft loves their obscure PowerShell commands!
upvoted 0 times
Nell
13 days ago
C) Run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
17 days ago
B) Create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
24 days ago
A) Configure custom detection rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chanel
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but C seems like the right choice. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet is probably the one that enables the regulatory record option in the retention labels.
upvoted 0 times
Casandra
4 days ago
User4: Sounds good, let's go with option C and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
5 days ago
User3: I agree, let's go ahead and run the cmdlet to enable the regulatory record option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
7 days ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. Let's try that first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
8 days ago
User1: I think we should go with option C and run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
24 days ago
User4: I agree, let's see if that makes the option visible when creating retention labels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
26 days ago
User3: Let's go ahead and try running the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, that sounds like the right choice to enable the regulatory record option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet should enable the regulatory record option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
2 months ago
User1: I think C is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
User1: I think we should run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwen
2 months ago
I'm not sure. Maybe we should also consider configuring custom detection rules to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I think the answer is B. Creating an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema would help define the structure of the regulatory records, which is necessary for the retention labels to recognize them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 months ago
I agree with Reta. Creating an EDM schema will help us ensure the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
3 months ago
I think we should first create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel