Discuss Microsoft MS-102 Exam Topic 11 Question 8

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription.

You plan to implement records management and enable users to designate documents as regulatory records.

You need to ensure that the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible when you create retention labels.

What should you do first?

AConfigure custom detection rules.

BCreate an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

CRun the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

DRun the Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet.

Suggested Answer: B

You need to assign the Security Administrator role.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/office-365-security/office-365-atp

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

37 comments · newest first

Pete 11 months ago

Custom detection rules seem like a good starting point, but I’m not convinced.

Stefania 11 months ago

I heard creating an EDM schema is important too, but not sure if it's the first step.

Eleni 11 months ago

Wait, can you really mark documents as regulatory records? Sounds complicated.

Bernardo 11 months ago

Definitely agree with that!

Desiree 12 months ago

I think you need to run the Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet first.

Eulah 12 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think the cmdlet for regulatory compliance might be the key, but I can't remember the exact details.

Jonelle 1 year ago

Running the Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet sounds familiar, but I feel like I need to double-check if that's the first thing we should do.

Leatha 1 year ago

I remember something about creating an EDM schema, but I can't recall if that directly relates to making retention labels visible.

Erick 1 year ago

I think we might need to configure custom detection rules first, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right step.

Pok 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The design challenge statement is typically framed as a "How might we..." question, which points me towards option C. The other options don't have that format.

Kirk 1 year ago

I think I've got a good handle on this. The question is asking about the specific requirements for the uniform capitalization method, so I'll use that knowledge to select the right answer.

Ligia 1 year ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Mounting a directory from the host into a container can be tricky, so I'll need to double-check the details to make sure I understand it correctly.

Rosalind 1 year ago

This looks like a straightforward question about the interfaces on a specific board. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about which ones are most likely to be found on that board.

Kassandra 1 year ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I thought Microsoft 365 E5 already had all the regulatory compliance features built-in. Guess I need to brush up on my Office 365 knowledge!

France 1 year ago

↳ replying to Kassandra

C) Run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

Darrin 1 year ago

↳ replying to Kassandra

B) Create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

Domonique 1 year ago

↳ replying to Kassandra

A) Configure custom detection rules.

Cyril 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards A. Custom detection rules could be used to identify the regulatory records, making it easier to apply the retention labels.

Yuriko 1 year ago

Haha, I bet the answer is D. The Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet is probably just a made-up option to confuse us. Microsoft loves their obscure PowerShell commands!

Nell 1 year ago

↳ replying to Yuriko

C) Run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

Lezlie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Yuriko

B) Create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

Kassandra 1 year ago

↳ replying to Yuriko

A) Configure custom detection rules.

Chanel 1 year ago

I'm not sure, but C seems like the right choice. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet is probably the one that enables the regulatory record option in the retention labels.

Casandra 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User4: Sounds good, let's go with option C and see if it works.

Nida 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User3: I agree, let's go ahead and run the cmdlet to enable the regulatory record option.

Raylene 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User2: Yeah, that makes sense. Let's try that first.

Odette 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User1: I think we should go with option C and run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

Rosalyn 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User4: I agree, let's see if that makes the option visible when creating retention labels.

Tiffiny 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User3: Let's go ahead and try running the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

Carolynn 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User2: Yeah, that sounds like the right choice to enable the regulatory record option.

Boris 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User2: Yeah, I agree. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet should enable the regulatory record option.

Lawana 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User1: I think C is the right choice.

Tasia 1 year ago

↳ replying to Chanel

User1: I think we should run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

Gwen 1 year ago

I'm not sure. Maybe we should also consider configuring custom detection rules to cover all bases.

Dorthy 2 years ago

I think the answer is B. Creating an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema would help define the structure of the regulatory records, which is necessary for the retention labels to recognize them.

Ora 2 years ago

I agree with Reta. Creating an EDM schema will help us ensure the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible.

Reta 2 years ago

I think we should first create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

Microsoft MS-102 Exam - Topic 11 Question 8 Discussion