Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MB-820 Exam - Topic 5 Question 13 Discussion

Posted by Lettie on May 29, 2024 at 07:18 AM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company plans to optimize its permission sets.

The company has the following permission sets:

You need to provide the following implementation for a third permission set:

* Create a new Permission Set C that is a composite of Permission Set A and Permission Set B.

* Assign Permission Set C to a user.

You need to ensure that the user has only read access to the Job table.

Solution: Set the Excluded Permission Sets property to Permission Set B.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: B

Assigning a SUPER permission set to all users would indeed resolve the permission errors and access issues reported by the users, as it grants full permissions across all objects and data in Business Central. However, this approach contradicts the principle of least privilege, which advocates for providing only the minimum levels of access necessary for users to perform their jobs. The SUPER permission set would excessively elevate user privileges, potentially leading to security risks and unintended modifications to critical data. Therefore, while assigning the SUPER permission set might technically resolve the immediate issues, it does not meet the goal of adhering to the principle of least privilege and is not a recommended solution.


Get Premium MB-820 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
ED
Edna 11 months ago
Just a fact: read access needs to be explicitly granted.
DE
Denise 11 months ago
I think it meets the goal, but I'm not sure.
LI
Lindsey 11 months ago
Wait, so excluding Permission Set B means no access at all?
KR
Krystina 12 months ago
Totally agree, it should include both sets!
CE
Cecily 12 months ago
The solution doesn't work as intended.
LA
Lashaunda 1 year ago
I think the key is understanding how the permissions stack. If Permission Set A has more access than just read, then excluding B might not help.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
I feel like the solution might not meet the goal because excluding a permission set could lead to unintended access issues.
DE
Devorah 1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to combine permission sets, and excluding one did change the access level. But I can't recall if it was the right approach here.
VI
Vincent 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure if excluding Permission Set B will actually give read access only. I think it might still allow some permissions from A.
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if the "Excluded Permission Sets" property is the right approach here. I'll need to think through this more carefully to make sure I understand the implications.
ER
Ernest 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. As long as I set the Excluded Permission Sets property correctly, the solution should meet the goal.
LA
Layla 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the "Excluded Permission Sets" property. Does that mean the user won't have any of the permissions from that set? I'll need to double-check that.
LE
Letha 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Creating a new composite permission set and then excluding the other set should give the user the right access level.
AL
Albina 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think through the solution step-by-step.
TO
Tomas 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about Jenkins. I'm pretty familiar with Jenkins, so I think I can handle this one.
JO
Jordan 1 year ago
To me, the most important thing a PIA does is determine the service provider's ability to maintain data protection controls. That seems like the best answer here.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
Option A with Latent Dirichlet Allocation could be a good way to identify latent topics or themes in the customer data. That might give us some useful insights.
TH
Theron 1 year ago
I came across a similar question before; I think it was about the -h flag showing section headers, which aligns with option D.
MI
Misty 1 year ago
Ah, the joys of permission sets! Where the only thing more confusing than the question is the answer.
GA
Garry 1 year ago
This question is a real brain-teaser. I better double-check the documentation before answering.
FR
Frankie 1 year ago
Oh, I get it now! The solution says we need to create a new Permission Set C that's a composite of A and B. Excluding B makes sense to ensure the user only has read access to the Job table.
SH
Shantay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frankie
B) No
WI
William 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frankie
That makes sense.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frankie
A) Yes
TW
Twanna 2 years ago
Wait, are we sure that's the right solution? Shouldn't we be creating a new permission set that inherits the necessary permissions from A and B?
JE
Jeannetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
That makes sense, we need to ensure the user has the right permissions
RO
Roxanne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
User 3: I agree with Roxanne, creating a new permission set seems like a better approach.
DA
Daron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
User 2: I'm not so sure, shouldn't we create a new permission set instead of excluding one?
AR
Ardella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
User 1: I think the solution is correct, we just need to exclude Permission Set B.
ST
Stefany 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
I think we should create a new permission set instead of excluding one
CU
Curtis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Twanna
No
LA
Lavonne 2 years ago
↳ replying to Twanna
Yes
BE
Becky 2 years ago
That's a good point. Maybe we need to consider a different solution.
CO
Coleen 2 years ago
I disagree. Excluding Permission Set B doesn't guarantee read access to the Job table.
BE
Becky 2 years ago
I think the solution meets the goal because it excludes Permission Set B.
EL
Eliseo 2 years ago
Hmm, seems straightforward. Setting the Excluded Permission Sets property to Permission Set B should do the trick.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eliseo
Helene: But the goal is to ensure the user has only read access to the Job table, so excluding Permission Set B should achieve that.
JA
Jamal 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eliseo
User 3: No, that won't meet the goal. We need to assign Permission Set C to the user.
HE
Helene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eliseo
User 2: Agreed, setting the Excluded Permission Sets property to Permission Set B should work.
LU
Ludivina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Eliseo
User 1: I think the solution is correct. Yes.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel