Microsoft Exam MB-500 Topic 6 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 6

[All MB-500 Questions]

You need to design the processAttachment method for the MigrateAttachment class. Which attribute should you use?

A[Replaceable(false)]

B[Replaceable(true)]

C[Wrappable(true)]

D(Hookable(false)]

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Marcos at Oct 25, 2024, 12:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dolores

5 months ago

Haha, Keneth's got the right idea. We need an [Attachable(true)] for this attachment migration, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Carmelina

4 months ago

I'm not sure, but maybe [Replaceable(false)] could also work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

5 months ago

I agree, [Replaceable(true)] is the attribute we should use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

5 months ago

I think [Wrappable(true)] would work better in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

5 months ago

Definitely, [Replaceable(true)] would be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

5 months ago

Hold up, where's the [Attachable(true)] option? That's the one I was looking for!

upvoted 0 times

Gladys

4 months ago

User4: I don't think that would work for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yong

4 months ago

User3: But what about option A) [Replaceable(false)]?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

5 months ago

User2: I agree, that seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

5 months ago

User1: I think we should go with option B) [Replaceable(true)].

upvoted 0 times

...

Han

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe D) [Hookable(false)] is the way to go? It could help with the attachment handling.

upvoted 0 times

Claribel

4 months ago

User 3: What about C) [Wrappable(true)]? Could that attribute be useful for handling attachments?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

4 months ago

User 2: I agree, using [Replaceable(false)] could ensure that the attachment is not replaced accidentally.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

5 months ago

User 1: I think A) [Replaceable(false)] might be a better choice for the processAttachment method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ludivina

6 months ago

C) [Wrappable(true)] sounds more appropriate to me. Wrapping the attachment might be useful for the migration.

upvoted 0 times

Claudia

5 months ago

D) (Hookable(false)]

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

5 months ago

C) [Wrappable(true)]

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricki

5 months ago

B) [Replaceable(true)]

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryrose

5 months ago

A) [Replaceable(false)]

upvoted 0 times

...

Earlean

6 months ago

I disagree, I believe option A) [Replaceable(false)] is the better choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

6 months ago

I think we should use option B) [Replaceable(true)].

upvoted 0 times

...

Yaeko

6 months ago

I think B) [Replaceable(true)] is the right choice. It allows the attachment to be replaced with a different attachment during the migration process.

upvoted 0 times

Golda

5 months ago

I'm not sure about D) (Hookable(false)), it doesn't seem relevant for the processAttachment method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

5 months ago

C) [Wrappable(true)] could also work if we want the attachment to be wrapped during the migration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

5 months ago

C) [Wrappable(true)] could also work, it allows the attachment to be wrapped in a different way if needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

5 months ago

I think A) [Replaceable(false)] would be a better choice to prevent the attachment from being replaced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

5 months ago

I think A) [Replaceable(false)] would be better, as we don't want the attachment to be replaced during migration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

6 months ago

I agree, B) [Replaceable(true)] seems like the best option for the processAttachment method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosann

6 months ago

I agree, B) [Replaceable(true)] is the best option for the processAttachment method.

upvoted 0 times

...