MENU
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution. Determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You must create a new attribute class in which to mark other classes in the ISV solution and their respective methods with the error levels Warning and Error. You have the following class: the numbers are included for reference only.)
You need 10 ensure that the compiler will report an error if code calls the bike method.
Solution:
Create the following attribute class:
Insert the following code at line 04:
Does The solution meet the goal?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium MB-500 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
WI
Willard
11 months ago
Not sure if this will work as intended.
PE
Peggie
11 months ago
Definitely meets the goal! No doubt about it.
AN
Annmarie
12 months ago
Wait, does this really ensure the compiler catches it?
HO
Holley
12 months ago
I think it misses some error handling though.
AN
Andrew
1 year ago
Looks like a solid solution to me!
SH
Sherron
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about whether the compiler will actually report an error just by adding the attribute. I hope I didn't miss something in my studies!
PA
Paris
1 year ago
I feel like the solution could be correct, but I need to double-check if the error levels are properly defined in the attribute class.
RY
Ryann
1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to create custom attributes. I wonder if the same logic applies here.
GE
Georgiann
1 year ago
I think the solution might meet the goal, but I'm not entirely sure if the attribute is correctly applied to enforce the error on the bike method.
SH
Sherill
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. A and B are clearly risks, as they describe uncertain future events that could negatively impact the project. C and D are issues, as they represent current problems that need to be addressed.
FI
Filiberto
1 year ago
I think we did a practice question where we had to detach associations similar to this. It seems like option C might be correct.
RO
Rosita
1 year ago
I think I remember that STP isn't used on server ports, but I'm a bit confused about whether it's MSTP or PVSTP+.
BA
Basilia
1 year ago
I always get confused between those options! I think "services hub" is correct, but can't recall if "Cisco ready" was part of the answer.
MA
Madonna
1 year ago
This solution seems pretty simple and elegant. The 'CannotCallBike' attribute should do the job nicely. Now, if only the exam questions were as clear-cut as this one!
LI
Lino
1 year ago
Definitely, adding that attribute class is a clear way to prevent errors in the code.
MA
Margurite
1 year ago
I think the solution will work, the attribute class is a good addition.
OL
Olene
1 year ago
I agree, it's a smart way to ensure the compiler catches those mistakes.
MA
Markus
1 year ago
That attribute class should definitely help catch any errors calling the bike method.
RE
Remona
1 year ago
Well, the solution looks straightforward enough. If the goal is to ensure the compiler reports an error when the bike method is called, then this should do the trick. I'm curious to see if there are any other approaches that could achieve the same result.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
Creating a new attribute class seems like the most efficient way to handle this situation.
NI
Nikita
1 year ago
I think option A) Yes is the correct answer here.
EL
Elenore
1 year ago
I agree, the solution seems clear and should work as intended.
AZ
Azzie
1 year ago
Haha, looks like the developers are trying to get creative with their error handling. I hope this 'CannotCallBike' attribute doesn't cause any unintended consequences down the line!
RO
Roy
1 year ago
B) No
AH
Ahmed
1 year ago
I hope so too!
CO
Colby
1 year ago
A) Yes
ME
Merissa
1 year ago
The solution seems to be on the right track, but I'm not sure if it will actually prevent the compiler from reporting an error when the bike method is called. I'll have to double-check the syntax and implementation details.
AJ
Aja
1 year ago
User 3: Let's double-check to make sure the compiler will report an error when the bike method is called.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
User 2: I'm not so sure, I need to verify the syntax and implementation details.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
User 1: I think the solution is correct.
BU
Bulah
2 years ago
But the new attribute class clearly marks the classes with the error levels.
LO
Lorean
2 years ago
I disagree, I don't think the solution is correct.
BU
Bulah
2 years ago
I think the solution meets the goal.