MENU
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You have an enumeration named truckStatus that has the following statuses:
Empty
Loaded
Completed
You have the following code:
You need to extend this enumeration and add the following statuses to the enumeration: Quarantine, InTransit. You must then modify code that validates the switch statement.
Solution: Add a post handler to the method that checks the enumeration and logic for your new enumeration values using the enumeration value.
Does the solution meet the goal?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium MB-500 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
LI
Lilli
11 months ago
I'm surprised they didn't mention how to handle existing cases.
AI
Aileen
11 months ago
Totally agree, the switch statement needs updating too!
CH
Christene
11 months ago
Wait, can you really just add those statuses like that?
KA
Kanisha
11 months ago
I think it needs more than just a post handler.
RO
Roy
12 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan to extend the enum!
EV
Eva
12 months ago
I thought we were supposed to directly modify the switch statement instead of adding a post handler. This is confusing!
YO
Yong
1 year ago
I feel like the post handler could work, but I’m uncertain if it’s the best way to handle the new enumeration values.
VI
Vince
1 year ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did about modifying switch statements. I think the solution might not fully validate the new statuses.
ST
Stanton
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how to extend enumerations in class, but I'm not sure if adding a post handler is the right approach here.
NA
Nada
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this! CASB stands for Cloud Access Security Broker, which is a security policy enforcement point between cloud customers and cloud services. That sounds like exactly what the question is asking about, so I'm confident A is the right answer.
AM
Amalia
1 year ago
This question seems to be testing our knowledge of the vRealize Operations Manager interface and features. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the options before selecting an answer.
AV
Avery
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'd go with option C and create an External ID field on the parent object.
DE
Dewitt
1 year ago
Okay, let's break this down. The client is trying to access a website, so it needs to resolve the domain name. The DNS request type that would return the IP address of the web server is type A. That's my best guess for the answer.
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
This seems straightforward to me. As the behavior analyst, my role is to focus on the ABA services I've been providing. I should remind the family that I'm not qualified to diagnose or treat mood disorders, and refer them to someone who specializes in that area.
CA
Carlee
1 year ago
The solution seems logical, but I'm a bit concerned about potential edge cases. Better double-check the switch statement to make sure it covers all scenarios.
DA
Dawne
1 year ago
Dell: Let's make sure to thoroughly test the switch statement with the new enumeration values.
HO
Hoa
1 year ago
User 3: Absolutely, covering all scenarios is crucial for the code to work correctly.
DE
Dell
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, I agree. But we should definitely review the switch statement to catch any edge cases.
WI
Winfred
1 year ago
User 1: I think the solution is good, it adds the new statuses and modifies the validation code.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
User 4: No, we need to ensure all scenarios are handled in the switch statement.
JU
Juliana
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, but we should definitely review the switch statement thoroughly.
CA
Carrol
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, it seems to cover the requirements.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
User 1: I think the solution is good.
MI
Mireya
2 years ago
Quarantine and InTransit, huh? I wonder if those are for the really stubborn trucks that refuse to follow the rules. *chuckles*
OZ
Ozell
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it seems like they needed some extra categories for those rebellious trucks.
GA
Gayla
1 year ago
User 1: Haha, maybe those new statuses are for the troublemaker trucks.
OM
Omega
2 years ago
I'm not sure. I think we need to consider other ways to handle the new enumeration values.
JE
Jeniffer
2 years ago
I agree with Elmira. The solution adds the new statuses and modifies the code to validate the switch statement.
JU
Jutta
2 years ago
Ah, I see. Extending the enumeration and modifying the code to handle the new values is the way to go. Looks like a straightforward solution to me.
EL
Elmira
2 years ago
I think the solution is correct because it adds the new statuses to the enumeration.
MI
Mitsue
2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think we need to consider other options before deciding.
LA
Launa
2 years ago
The solution seems to work, but adding new enum values can be a bit tricky. I hope the switch statement handles all the cases properly.
MA
Magda
1 year ago
It's important to ensure all cases are covered in the switch statement.
EU
Eun
1 year ago
B) No
DO
Dorcas
1 year ago
The switch statement should be updated to handle the new enum values.
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
A) Yes.
LU
Luisa
2 years ago
I agree with Trinidad, the solution adds the new statuses and modifies the validation code.
TR
Trinidad
2 years ago
I think the solution is correct.