New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MB-335 Exam - Topic 5 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-335 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 5
[All MB-335 Questions]

A company produces rubber hose. Discrete orders accounts for raw material scrap. The scrap is reported through inventory movement journals.

The company has noticed that most of the scrap that is recorded is due to start up that feeds the hose to the finishing process. In addition, the amount of scrap that is recorded is consistent regardless of the amount of hose being produced.

You need to account for material lost during startup.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gennie
3 months ago
D sounds interesting, but is it really variable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
3 months ago
C is definitely the way to go, match actual usage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
3 months ago
Wait, how can scrap be constant if production varies?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
Not sure about that, B seems better for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
4 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
4 months ago
Option D sounds interesting since it refers to variable scrap, but I’m a bit confused about how that would apply to the consistent scrap we see during startup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C because it mentions matching the actual amount used, but I feel like I need to double-check how that relates to startup processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to account for scrap, and I think option B could be relevant since it suggests analyzing the scrap items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
5 months ago
I think option A makes sense since it talks about constant scrap, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best way to handle startup losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
5 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'm leaning towards option B, where I would do a case study on the scrap items and enter the average amount as a separate line item. That way, I can track the scrap more closely and make adjustments as needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the scrap is consistent and not tied to production volume, the best approach would be to enter it as a constant scrap amount in the bill of materials. That way, it will be accounted for accurately in the cost calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there are a few different options, and I'm not sure which one is the best approach. I'll need to think through the implications of each choice carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about accounting for material scrap in a manufacturing process. I think the key is to understand that the scrap is consistent regardless of production volume, so it should be treated as a fixed cost rather than a variable one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
Option C seems like the most straightforward approach, but I can see the logic behind option A as well. It's a tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 year ago
Haha, 'variable scrap' in option D? That sounds like something straight out of a comedy sketch about accounting!
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
1 year ago
D: Haha, 'variable scrap' does sound pretty funny though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 year ago
C: I agree with A, option D seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 year ago
B: Really? I was leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 year ago
A: I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
1 year ago
I agree with Alline. Option A makes the most sense since the scrap is consistent regardless of the amount of hose produced.
upvoted 0 times
Melda
1 year ago
Yes, it seems like the most efficient way to handle the consistent scrap issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 year ago
I agree, it would help account for the material lost during startup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It makes sense to enter the amount of scrap as constant in the Bill of materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jestine
1 year ago
I think we should enter the consumption amount on the line to match the actual amount used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
The constant scrap mentioned in option A seems like the way to go. It's a predictable amount that's not dependent on the production volume.
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
1 year ago
Yeah, option A seems like the simplest solution to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 year ago
I think option A is more efficient in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to do a case study first, like option B suggests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 year ago
I agree, option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should do a case study for the scrap items and enter the average amount separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 year ago
I think we should enter the amount of scrap as constant in the Bill of materials.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel