Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-335 Topic 5 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-335 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 5
[All MB-335 Questions]

A company plans to use master planning in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. The company will sell items between legal entities.

The company has several facilities across legal entities that can manufacture the same products. Same products are produced only in some plants. To meet product demand, when one facility is over capacity, another facility is used to fulfill the downstream demand.

The organizational entities are:

* LegalEntityA: Plant 1.2, and 3

* LegalEntityB: Plant4and 5

* LegalEntityC: Plant 6. 7, and 8

The following plants must be planned together:

* Plant 1. Plant 3. and Plant 4

* Plant 2. Plant 6. and Plant 8

* Plant 5 and Plant 7

You need to configure master planning for the facilities.

Which configuration mechanism should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Francis
13 days ago
Ah, the age-old question: what's the best way to plan production when you have too many plants and not enough capacity? I say we just buy a few more plants and call it a day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
19 days ago
D. Intercompany planning groups, for sure. It's the only option that specifically mentions handling production across legal entities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 months ago
I'm going to go with B. Item model groups, because they can group the same products together, right? Seems like the logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Amina
8 days ago
A: Exactly. It's a good choice for configuring master planning in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
15 days ago
B: That makes sense. It will help in managing the planning for the same products across different facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
19 days ago
A: Yes, you're right. Item model groups are used to group similar products together for planning purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'm leaning towards C. Coverage groups might be able to handle the capacity balancing between the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is D. Intercompany planning groups seem like the best way to coordinate production across the different legal entities and facilities.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
22 days ago
D: Intercompany planning groups definitely seem like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
27 days ago
C: Coverage groups might be useful to manage inventory levels and ensure demand is met across all facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
1 months ago
B: I think Production groups could also work since it allows for grouping of facilities based on production capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 months ago
A: I agree, using intercompany planning groups would allow for better coordination between the different legal entities and facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bonita
2 months ago
But don't you think Intercompany planning groups would be better for managing facilities across legal entities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Coverage groups would be more suitable for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
2 months ago
I think we should use Production groups for configuring master planning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel