Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-330 Topic 20 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 20
[All MB-330 Questions]

A company uses Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. The company acquired a multinational food packaging business that has 30 facilities operating in multiple countries/regions.

Packaging machines must be systematically registered and tracked across all facilities

You need to create the packing machine assets to meet the tracking requirements.

What should you create?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vincent
9 days ago
Hmm, that's a fair point. A) functional location does seem like the foundational piece here. Maybe we start with that, and then layer on the lifecycle model and location types as needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
9 days ago
Yeah, I can see the logic in both C and D. But I'm worried that just creating a functional location type might not be enough to fully meet the tracking requirement. The lifecycle state option sounds like it would give us more control and visibility over the machines as they move between facilities. I'm gonna go with D on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
10 days ago
Haha, I love these tricky Dynamics 365 questions. They always try to trip you up with similar-sounding options. But I think the key here is the requirement to 'systematically register and track' the machines. That tells me we need to create some kind of lifecycle model, so I'm going with D) functional location lifecycle state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
11 days ago
Hold on, what about A) functional location? Isn't that the basic building block for all this? I mean, you need to actually create the asset itself before you can start tracking its life cycle or categorizing it, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
11 days ago
I agree, this is definitely about functional locations. From the information given, it sounds like we need to create a way to systematically register and track the packaging machines. So I'm leaning towards C) functional location type as the best answer. That would let us define the different types of packaging machines and associate them with the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
12 days ago
Ooh, good point! I didn't even think of that. The life cycle model could be super helpful, especially for a multinational company with so many facilities. I'm leaning towards B) now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
13 days ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of functional locations in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. I think the answer is either C) functional location type or D) functional location lifecycle state. We need to create something that allows us to track the packaging machines across all facilities, and those two options seem most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
14 days ago
I don't know, you guys. What about B) functional location lifecycle model? Wouldn't that be better to track the life cycle of the machines, like when they were installed, serviced, and potentially replaced? That seems like crucial information to have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
15 days ago
I was thinking the same thing, C) functional location type. That way you can have different types of machines and track them accordingly. Plus, it sounds like it's the most comprehensive option to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
17 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between these options, but I think I might go with C) functional location type. That sounds like it would be the best way to categorize the different types of packaging machines across all the facilities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel