Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-330 Exam - Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items* a runtime filter for the C itemsThe Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.What should you do?Select only one answer.
B) Create a master plan with plan filter for the C items only. Do not set up a runtime filter for C items.
A) Add the C items to the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A, B, and D items.
C) Create a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter. Add an advanced filter for the C items on the planned orders.
D) Create a dynamic plan and a static plan. Do not set up plan filters or runtime filters.
E) Retain the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A and C items.

Microsoft MB-330 Exam - Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 14
[All MB-330 Questions]

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.

You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:

* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items

* a runtime filter for the C items

The Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.

You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.

What should you do?

Select only one answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jaclyn at Sep 03, 2023, 08:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-330 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kirby
10 months ago
Option E is a solid choice too, keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
10 months ago
I’m surprised they didn’t mention the impact on A, B, and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
10 months ago
Wait, no plan filter at all? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
Nah, I disagree. Option C seems more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for C items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
11 months ago
I recall that dynamic and static plans can be useful, but I'm uncertain if not having any filters at all would yield the desired results for the C items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage filters effectively. I feel like option C might be the right approach, but I need to double-check the advanced filter concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
11 months ago
I think creating a master plan with just the C items could work, but I'm not sure if not having a runtime filter is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
11 months ago
I remember that adding C items to the existing plan filter might not be the best choice since it could affect the A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different filter options here. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between a plan filter and a runtime filter. Maybe I'll try to find an example or explanation of those concepts before I decide on an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Option C looks like the way to go. Creating a master plan with no filters, and then using an advanced filter for just the C items on the planned orders. That way, I can isolate the C items without having to mess with the other categories. Seems like the cleanest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
11 months ago
Hmm, the key here seems to be producing results for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items. I'm leaning towards option B - creating a master plan with a plan filter for just the C items. That way, I can focus on optimizing the C items without having to worry about the other categories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements, but I think I'll start by carefully reading through the options and trying to visualize how each one would work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
11 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The pattern seems familiar, and I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
11 months ago
I'm going to calculate the time periods carefully. The first deposit is from 2005 to 2015, and the second from 2011 to 2015. Different compounding periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know a data store is where data is stored, but I'm not sure if that's the Stephene as a repository of data. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident about these ratio questions. Just need to read the details and follow the standard computation method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
12 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Option A sounds like a key benefit of the distributed cache for AI training workloads. Option B mentions support for different storage backends, which is important for flexibility. And options C and D cover caching layers and data sharing, which are also critical features. I'll select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Adding the C items to the existing plan filter and setting up a runtime filter for them? Sounds like a textbook solution to me. Nothing fancy, but sometimes the simple answers are the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
Hold up, did I just read that correctly? Option D says 'Create a dynamic plan and a static plan'? I'm not sure if that's a genius move or a recipe for disaster. Either way, it's definitely *dynamic*!
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
1 year ago
Yeah, Option A seems like the safest choice to get results for the C items without causing any issues for the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I think we should go with Option A to keep it simple and ensure we don't affect the A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
1 year ago
Option D does sound interesting, but it might be too complex for our current setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiana
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option E. Keeping the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for the A and C items seems like a solid approach. Simple and straightforward, just the way I like it.
upvoted 0 times
Sabine
1 year ago
Definitely, sticking with the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for specific items is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 year ago
I agree, simplicity is key when it comes to planning optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 year ago
Option E sounds like a good choice. It keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brice
1 year ago
Ooh, option C sounds intriguing. No filters at all and using an advanced filter on the planned orders? That's a bold move, but it might just work. Gotta love a bit of creative problem-solving!
upvoted 0 times
Karl
1 year ago
I agree with you. It's a bit risky, but it could pay off in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about option C. Maybe we should stick to a more traditional approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
Yeah, it's definitely thinking outside the box. Could be the solution we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
1 year ago
I think option C could be worth a try. It's different from the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
1 year ago
But wouldn't creating a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter and adding an advanced filter for the C items be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I think option B is the way to go - creating a master plan with a plan filter for the C items only. Seems like the cleanest solution without messing with the other item types.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
1 year ago
Yeah, option B seems like the best way to handle the C items without affecting the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
Creating a master plan just for the C items does sound like a clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the safest bet. It won't interfere with the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Option B does sound like a good choice. It keeps things separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should create a master plan with plan filter for the C items only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 year ago
I think we should add the C items to the existing plan filter for A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel