Microsoft MB-330 Exam - Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam

Question #: 80
Topic #: 14

[All MB-330 Questions]

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.

You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:

* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items

* a runtime filter for the C items

The Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.

You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.

What should you do?

Select only one answer.

AAdd the C items to the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A, B, and D items.

BCreate a master plan with plan filter for the C items only. Do not set up a runtime filter for C items.

CCreate a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter. Add an advanced filter for the C items on the planned orders.

DCreate a dynamic plan and a static plan. Do not set up plan filters or runtime filters.

ERetain the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A and C items.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jaclyn at Sep 03, 2023, 08:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-330 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kirby

5 months ago

Option E is a solid choice too, keeps things organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

5 months ago

I’m surprised they didn’t mention the impact on A, B, and D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

5 months ago

Wait, no plan filter at all? That sounds risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

5 months ago

Nah, I disagree. Option C seems more effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

5 months ago

I think option B makes the most sense for C items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

6 months ago

I recall that dynamic and static plans can be useful, but I'm uncertain if not having any filters at all would yield the desired results for the C items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

6 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to manage filters effectively. I feel like option C might be the right approach, but I need to double-check the advanced filter concept.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blossom

6 months ago

I think creating a master plan with just the C items could work, but I'm not sure if not having a runtime filter is a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

6 months ago

I remember that adding C items to the existing plan filter might not be the best choice since it could affect the A, B, and D items.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm a little confused by the different filter options here. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between a plan filter and a runtime filter. Maybe I'll try to find an example or explanation of those concepts before I decide on an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dudley

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. Option C looks like the way to go. Creating a master plan with no filters, and then using an advanced filter for just the C items on the planned orders. That way, I can isolate the C items without having to mess with the other categories. Seems like the cleanest approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

6 months ago

Hmm, the key here seems to be producing results for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items. I'm leaning towards option B - creating a master plan with a plan filter for just the C items. That way, I can focus on optimizing the C items without having to worry about the other categories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

6 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements, but I think I'll start by carefully reading through the options and trying to visualize how each one would work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

6 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The pattern seems familiar, and I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

6 months ago

I'm going to calculate the time periods carefully. The first deposit is from 2005 to 2015, and the second from 2011 to 2015. Different compounding periods.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know a data store is where data is stored, but I'm not sure if that's the Stephene as a repository of data. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

6 months ago

I'm pretty confident about these ratio questions. Just need to read the details and follow the standard computation method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devon

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Option A sounds like a key benefit of the distributed cache for AI training workloads. Option B mentions support for different storage backends, which is important for flexibility. And options C and D cover caching layers and data sharing, which are also critical features. I'll select those.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

11 months ago

Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Adding the C items to the existing plan filter and setting up a runtime filter for them? Sounds like a textbook solution to me. Nothing fancy, but sometimes the simple answers are the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

11 months ago

Hold up, did I just read that correctly? Option D says 'Create a dynamic plan and a static plan'? I'm not sure if that's a genius move or a recipe for disaster. Either way, it's definitely *dynamic*!

upvoted 0 times

Leoma

10 months ago

Yeah, Option A seems like the safest choice to get results for the C items without causing any issues for the other items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

10 months ago

I think we should go with Option A to keep it simple and ensure we don't affect the A, B, and D items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

10 months ago

Option D does sound interesting, but it might be too complex for our current setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

11 months ago

I'm leaning towards option E. Keeping the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for the A and C items seems like a solid approach. Simple and straightforward, just the way I like it.

upvoted 0 times

Sabine

10 months ago

Definitely, sticking with the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for specific items is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

10 months ago

I agree, simplicity is key when it comes to planning optimization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marica

11 months ago

Option E sounds like a good choice. It keeps things organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brice

12 months ago

Ooh, option C sounds intriguing. No filters at all and using an advanced filter on the planned orders? That's a bold move, but it might just work. Gotta love a bit of creative problem-solving!

upvoted 0 times

Karl

11 months ago

I agree with you. It's a bit risky, but it could pay off in the end.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

11 months ago

I'm not so sure about option C. Maybe we should stick to a more traditional approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

11 months ago

Yeah, it's definitely thinking outside the box. Could be the solution we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

11 months ago

I think option C could be worth a try. It's different from the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yaeko

12 months ago

But wouldn't creating a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter and adding an advanced filter for the C items be a better option?

upvoted 0 times

...

Susy

1 year ago

Hmm, this seems tricky. I think option B is the way to go - creating a master plan with a plan filter for the C items only. Seems like the cleanest solution without messing with the other item types.

upvoted 0 times