Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-330 Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 14
[All MB-330 Questions]

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.

You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:

* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items

* a runtime filter for the C items

The Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.

You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.

What should you do?

Select only one answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gearldine
1 months ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Adding the C items to the existing plan filter and setting up a runtime filter for them? Sounds like a textbook solution to me. Nothing fancy, but sometimes the simple answers are the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 months ago
Hold up, did I just read that correctly? Option D says 'Create a dynamic plan and a static plan'? I'm not sure if that's a genius move or a recipe for disaster. Either way, it's definitely *dynamic*!
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
12 days ago
Yeah, Option A seems like the safest choice to get results for the C items without causing any issues for the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
17 days ago
I think we should go with Option A to keep it simple and ensure we don't affect the A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
20 days ago
Option D does sound interesting, but it might be too complex for our current setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiana
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option E. Keeping the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for the A and C items seems like a solid approach. Simple and straightforward, just the way I like it.
upvoted 0 times
Sabine
9 days ago
Definitely, sticking with the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for specific items is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
14 days ago
I agree, simplicity is key when it comes to planning optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 months ago
Option E sounds like a good choice. It keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brice
2 months ago
Ooh, option C sounds intriguing. No filters at all and using an advanced filter on the planned orders? That's a bold move, but it might just work. Gotta love a bit of creative problem-solving!
upvoted 0 times
Karl
1 months ago
I agree with you. It's a bit risky, but it could pay off in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about option C. Maybe we should stick to a more traditional approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 months ago
Yeah, it's definitely thinking outside the box. Could be the solution we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
2 months ago
I think option C could be worth a try. It's different from the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
2 months ago
But wouldn't creating a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter and adding an advanced filter for the C items be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I think option B is the way to go - creating a master plan with a plan filter for the C items only. Seems like the cleanest solution without messing with the other item types.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
1 months ago
Yeah, option B seems like the best way to handle the C items without affecting the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 months ago
Creating a master plan just for the C items does sound like a clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the safest bet. It won't interfere with the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
Option B does sound like a good choice. It keeps things separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should create a master plan with plan filter for the C items only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
3 months ago
I think we should add the C items to the existing plan filter for A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel