Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-330 Exam - Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items* a runtime filter for the C itemsThe Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.What should you do?Select only one answer.
B) Create a master plan with plan filter for the C items only. Do not set up a runtime filter for C items.
A) Add the C items to the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A, B, and D items.
C) Create a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter. Add an advanced filter for the C items on the planned orders.
D) Create a dynamic plan and a static plan. Do not set up plan filters or runtime filters.
E) Retain the existing plan filter for the A, B, and D items. Set up a runtime filter for the A and C items.

Microsoft MB-330 Exam - Topic 14 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-330 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 14
[All MB-330 Questions]

A company classifies items as A, B, C, and D for planning purposes.

You run Planning Optimization for the C items with the following setup:

* a plan filter for the A, B, and D items

* a runtime filter for the C items

The Planning Optimization output does not create any planned orders.

You need to produce results in Planning Optimization for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items.

What should you do?

Select only one answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jaclyn at Sep 03, 2023, 08:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-330 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kirby
6 months ago
Option E is a solid choice too, keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
7 months ago
I’m surprised they didn’t mention the impact on A, B, and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
7 months ago
Wait, no plan filter at all? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
7 months ago
Nah, I disagree. Option C seems more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
7 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for C items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
I recall that dynamic and static plans can be useful, but I'm uncertain if not having any filters at all would yield the desired results for the C items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage filters effectively. I feel like option C might be the right approach, but I need to double-check the advanced filter concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
8 months ago
I think creating a master plan with just the C items could work, but I'm not sure if not having a runtime filter is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
8 months ago
I remember that adding C items to the existing plan filter might not be the best choice since it could affect the A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different filter options here. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between a plan filter and a runtime filter. Maybe I'll try to find an example or explanation of those concepts before I decide on an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Option C looks like the way to go. Creating a master plan with no filters, and then using an advanced filter for just the C items on the planned orders. That way, I can isolate the C items without having to mess with the other categories. Seems like the cleanest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
8 months ago
Hmm, the key here seems to be producing results for the C items without affecting the A, B, and D items. I'm leaning towards option B - creating a master plan with a plan filter for just the C items. That way, I can focus on optimizing the C items without having to worry about the other categories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the requirements, but I think I'll start by carefully reading through the options and trying to visualize how each one would work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
8 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The pattern seems familiar, and I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
8 months ago
I'm going to calculate the time periods carefully. The first deposit is from 2005 to 2015, and the second from 2011 to 2015. Different compounding periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know a data store is where data is stored, but I'm not sure if that's the Stephene as a repository of data. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident about these ratio questions. Just need to read the details and follow the standard computation method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Option A sounds like a key benefit of the distributed cache for AI training workloads. Option B mentions support for different storage backends, which is important for flexibility. And options C and D cover caching layers and data sharing, which are also critical features. I'll select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Adding the C items to the existing plan filter and setting up a runtime filter for them? Sounds like a textbook solution to me. Nothing fancy, but sometimes the simple answers are the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
Hold up, did I just read that correctly? Option D says 'Create a dynamic plan and a static plan'? I'm not sure if that's a genius move or a recipe for disaster. Either way, it's definitely *dynamic*!
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
12 months ago
Yeah, Option A seems like the safest choice to get results for the C items without causing any issues for the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I think we should go with Option A to keep it simple and ensure we don't affect the A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
1 year ago
Option D does sound interesting, but it might be too complex for our current setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiana
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option E. Keeping the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for the A and C items seems like a solid approach. Simple and straightforward, just the way I like it.
upvoted 0 times
Sabine
12 months ago
Definitely, sticking with the existing plan filter and adding a runtime filter for specific items is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
12 months ago
I agree, simplicity is key when it comes to planning optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 year ago
Option E sounds like a good choice. It keeps things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brice
1 year ago
Ooh, option C sounds intriguing. No filters at all and using an advanced filter on the planned orders? That's a bold move, but it might just work. Gotta love a bit of creative problem-solving!
upvoted 0 times
Karl
1 year ago
I agree with you. It's a bit risky, but it could pay off in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about option C. Maybe we should stick to a more traditional approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
Yeah, it's definitely thinking outside the box. Could be the solution we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
1 year ago
I think option C could be worth a try. It's different from the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
1 year ago
But wouldn't creating a master plan with no plan filter or runtime filter and adding an advanced filter for the C items be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I think option B is the way to go - creating a master plan with a plan filter for the C items only. Seems like the cleanest solution without messing with the other item types.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
1 year ago
Yeah, option B seems like the best way to handle the C items without affecting the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
Creating a master plan just for the C items does sound like a clean solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the safest bet. It won't interfere with the other items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Option B does sound like a good choice. It keeps things separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should create a master plan with plan filter for the C items only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 year ago
I think we should add the C items to the existing plan filter for A, B, and D items.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel