MENU
You need to prevent the issue from reoccurring for User5.
What should you do?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium MB-310 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
KE
Kelvin
12 months ago
I thought we were supposed to focus on sampling, C might be better.
CH
Chuck
1 year ago
Wait, can we really trust the audit list for this?
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
I agree with Yolande, A makes the most sense!
AL
Allene
1 year ago
Not sure about that, B seems more relevant.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice.
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
I'm torn between the audit list and adding keywords. I feel like both could be relevant, but I need to think more about the context.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Adding more keywords to the audit policy sounds familiar; I feel like that could be a good way to catch similar issues in the future.
CO
Cordell
1 year ago
I remember practicing with aggregate queries before, but I can't recall if they were specifically for entertainment expenses.
MA
Mary
1 year ago
I think using the audit list search query type could help, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option for preventing future issues.
AL
Alyce
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Let me think it through - Staged Restore is probably related to restoring specific objects, so I'll go with Option C.
MA
Marvel
1 year ago
Ah, I see. It's probably either the criteria-based sharing or the cross-object workflow updates that are causing the recursive trigger firing. I'll need to double-check those options.