Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 8 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam

Question #: 56
Topic #: 8

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A client has one legal entity, two departments, and two divisions. The client is implementing Dynamics 365 Finance. The departments and divisions are set up as financial dimensions.

The client has the following requirements:

Only expense accounts require dimensions posted with the transactions.

Users must not have the option to select dimensions for a balance sheet account.

You need to configure the ledger to show applicable financial dimensions based on the main account selected in journal entry.

Solution: Configure two account structures: one for expense accounts and include applicable dimensions, and one for balance sheet and exclude financial dimensions.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/finance/general-ledger/configure-account-structures

by Barrett at May 07, 2022, 10:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sabra

5 months ago

Two account structures? That's a bit much, isn't it?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tabetha

5 months ago

I think it might be overcomplicating things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelaide

5 months ago

Wait, can you really exclude dimensions for balance sheet accounts?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

5 months ago

Definitely meets the requirements!

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

5 months ago

Sounds like a solid plan!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquita

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about whether the solution fully meets the requirements. What if there are exceptions we haven’t considered?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

5 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question where we had to configure dimensions based on account types. I feel like this approach is similar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure if having two account structures is the only way to achieve this. I remember something about using rules for dimensions too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

5 months ago

I think the solution makes sense since it separates the account structures for expenses and balance sheet accounts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nguyet

6 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not super familiar with the StoreOnce 3620 specifically. I'll have to review the material again and see if I can figure out the right approach to expanding the capacity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalie

6 months ago

I think there's also a rule about how only users in the ALFRESCO_MODEL_ADMINISTRATORS group can access Model Manager? But I'm a bit unsure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherrell

6 months ago

I've got this! The technician needs the Field Service-Dispatcher role to handle the dispatcher functions, and the Field Service-App Access and Field Service-Resource roles to use the mobile app for work orders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The Dodge-Romig tables are used to minimize the Average Quality Level (AQL), which is the maximum percentage of defective items that's considered acceptable. So I'll choose option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

6 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if Power Virtual Agents chatbots would be the best fit here, since the requirements don't mention any need for conversational interactions. I'd focus more on the process automation and mobile app components.

upvoted 0 times

...