Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 4 Question 129 Discussion

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.What should you do?
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
C) Associate the vendor record to The settlement period.
D) Set up the jurisdiction and associate the jurisdiction to the tax authority

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 4 Question 129 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 129
Topic #: 4
[All MB-310 Questions]

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.

The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.

You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Glenna at Apr 03, 2026, 05:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leota
9 hours ago
Not sure if this is the best approach, sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
6 days ago
Jurisdiction setup is also important, but B seems right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
11 days ago
Wait, why do we need a vendor record for tax authorities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
2 months ago
Totally agree, option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 months ago
You need to set up a vendor record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards associating the vendor record to the settlement period, but I can't recall if that’s the correct approach for tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
3 months ago
I feel like setting up a customer record for the tax authority could be relevant, but it seems off for remitting payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
3 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to set up jurisdictions. Maybe option D is the right choice here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
3 months ago
I think we might need to associate the vendor record to the tax authority, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only step needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel