New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 5 Question 119 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 119
Topic #: 5
[All MB-310 Questions]

A company has implemented Dynamics 365 Finance.

The company pays taxes quarterly to the states of Florida, Nebraska, and Washington. These states have been set up as tax authorities within Dynamics 365 Finance.

You need to configure the system to remit tax payments.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Venita at Jul 03, 2025, 01:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brinda
2 months ago
D is also important for jurisdiction setup!
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
3 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
3 months ago
You need to associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
3 months ago
Not sure if this is the best approach, seems complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
3 months ago
Wait, why not just set up a customer record instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
4 months ago
I thought we had to set up the settlement period as part of the vendor record, but now I'm confused about the jurisdiction part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I can't recall if the jurisdiction setup is mandatory for all states.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
I remember a practice question about tax remittance, and I feel like setting up a customer record might not be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
I think we need to associate the vendor record to the tax authority, but I'm not completely sure if that's the only step needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
4 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the best approach is to set up the jurisdiction and associate it to the tax authority. That seems like the most direct way to configure the system for remitting the tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
5 months ago
I'm a little confused on the difference between setting up a customer record for the tax authority versus associating the vendor record. I'll need to review the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I believe we need to set up the jurisdiction and associate it to the tax authority. That should allow us to properly remit the tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Do we need to associate the vendor record to the tax authority, or is there something else we need to do?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
5 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to set up the tax authorities correctly in Dynamics 365 Finance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
7 months ago
Wait, hold on. Isn't there supposed to be a fifth option that says 'All of the above'? That's usually the correct answer, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
7 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question has a twisted sense of humor. None of these options seem quite right to me.
upvoted 0 times
Andra
6 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
6 months ago
B) Associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
6 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
6 months ago
A) Set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marta
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't associating the vendor record to the tax authority make more sense? That way, the system can track the payments directly.
upvoted 0 times
Wilda
7 months ago
I agree, associating the vendor record to the tax authority seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
7 months ago
I think setting up a customer record for the tax authority would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalind
8 months ago
I think setting up the jurisdiction and associating it to the tax authority makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should associate the vendor record to the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
8 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Setting up the jurisdiction and associating it with the tax authority seems like the logical step to configure the system for tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
7 months ago
Yes, option D makes the most sense. It's crucial to have the jurisdiction set up and associated with the tax authority for accurate tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
8 months ago
I think option D is the correct choice as well. It ensures that the system is configured properly for remitting tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
8 months ago
I agree, setting up the jurisdiction and associating it with the tax authority is important for tax payments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
8 months ago
I think we should set up a customer record for the tax authority.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel