Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 3 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 3

The controller at a company has multiple employees who enter standard General ledger journals. The controller wants to review these journal entries before they are posted. Currently, journals entries are posted without review.

You need to configure Dynamics 365 Finance to help set up a system led review process to meet the controller's needs.

Which functionality should you configure?

Athe controller's security role so that he has approval privileges for General ledger journals

Ban Advanced ledger entry workflow that uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting, associated with the Advanced ledger journal name

Ca Ledger daily journal workflow that uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting, associated with the General ledger

Da manual journal approval with the journal assigned to the user group that the employees are assigned to

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Aleta at Jul 07, 2024, 07:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rosalind

22 days ago

Definitely B). The advanced workflow feature is perfect for this scenario. Although, I do wonder if the controller has superhuman review speeds. Might need to invest in some coffee or energy drinks!

upvoted 0 times

Major

2 days ago

I agree, option B) with the advanced ledger entry workflow seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dwight

27 days ago

I don't know, man. As long as I get the job done, who cares about the details? Just give me the answer and let's move on. (whistles casually)

upvoted 0 times

Kristal

1 days ago

A) the controller's security role so that he has approval privileges for General ledger journals

upvoted 0 times

...

Annalee

1 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. C) might work too, but it's specific to the General Ledger, so B) seems more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

Abraham

9 days ago

I think B) is the best option because it uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julene

1 months ago

B) seems like the best option to set up an advanced ledger entry workflow for journal posting review. That way, the organizational hierarchy can be used to route the journal entries for approval before posting.

upvoted 0 times

Helene

17 days ago

Absolutely, having a structured workflow for journal entry review can help prevent errors and ensure compliance with company policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dong

19 days ago

I think it's important to have a system in place that allows for proper oversight and approval of journal entries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

22 days ago

It would definitely help streamline the review process and ensure accuracy in the financial records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

29 days ago

I agree, setting up an advanced ledger entry workflow would be the most efficient way to ensure the controller can review journal entries before they are posted.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

2 months ago

That's a good point, Kayleigh. Option D would definitely provide a more hands-on approach to reviewing journal entries.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is more practical. Assigning manual journal approval to the user group would ensure all entries are reviewed before posting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

2 months ago

I think option B is the best choice. It uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting, which would help the controller review the entries.

upvoted 0 times

...